Utilization of Kepler.gl in the Development of a Digital Geography Learning Module on Population Density
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jtp.v11i4.22585Keywords:
Digital Learning Module, geography education, Kepler.gl, Geospatial Visualization, Population DensityAbstract
Digital learning modules and geospatial visualization have largely been developed separately in geography education, and interactive maps are often embedded as illustrations rather than used as evidence for learning tasks. This study developed a Kepler.gl-integrated digital geography learning module on population density for Grade XI students and evaluated its feasibility and practicality. The ADDIE model was employed. Learning needs were identified through a questionnaire completed by 36 students and an interview with a geography teacher. The module was validated by a content expert and a media expert and then implemented with 111 students in four classes and two geography teachers at a public senior high school in Malang Regency, Indonesia. Data were collected using validation sheets and four-point response questionnaires and were analyzed descriptively. In the module, Kepler.gl maps of district-level population density for 2020, 2023, and a 2025 projection serve as the data source for worksheet tasks in which students classify, compare, and explain density patterns. The module obtained feasibility scores of 95.24% from the content expert and 91.67% from the media expert, and practicality scores of 92.13% from students and 87.50% from teachers, all in the highest category. The module was usable on computers and smartphones, although map loading depended on internet stability and students needed brief orientation. These results indicate expert-rated feasibility and user-perceived practicality. The module's contribution to students' understanding and spatial thinking was not examined and remains a topic for further research.
References
Arnab, S., Petridis, P., Spatioti, A. G., Kazanidis, I., & Pange, J. (2022). A Comparative Study of the ADDIE Instructional Design Model in Distance Education. Information, 13(9), 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13090402
Bernhäuserová, V., Havelková, L., Hátlová, K., & Hanus, M. (2022). The Limits of GIS Implementation in Education: A Systematic Review. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11(12), 592. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11120592
Bernhäuserová, V., Krajňáková, L., Řezníčková, D., & Hanus, M. (2025). Teachers’ perceived limits to GIS use in schools and implications for teacher training. Journal of Geography, 124(5), 127–145.
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Branch, R. M., & Varank, İ. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach (Vol. 722). Springer.
Cahyanti, B. D., Murtini, S., & Prasetya, S. P. (2023). Implementasi pembelajaran kontekstual terhadap kemampuan berpikir spasial peserta didik kelas XI dalam pembelajaran geografi materi mitigasi bencana alam. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(11), 9529–9537.
Cyvin, J. B., Midtaune, K., & Rød, J. K. (2022). Using StoryMaps to prepare for field course – A case study of students in geography. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2123583. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2123583
Ericson, K., & Häikiö, T. K. (2025). Visuality and multimodality as tools for learning in geography and art education. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 59(2), 50–73.
Favier, T. T., & van der Schee, J. A. (2012). Exploring the characteristics of an optimal design for inquiry-based geography education with geographic information systems. Computers & Education, 58(1), 666–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.007
Hamid, S. N. M., Lee, T.-Y., Taha, H., Rahim, N. A., & Sharif, A. M. (2021). E-content module for chemistry massive open online course (MOOC): Development and students’ perceptions. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(1), 67–92.
Handoyo, B. (2021). Geografi untuk SMA Kelas XI (Pertama). Pusat Perbukuan Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Islamiati, E. F., Subagia, I. W., & Suma, K. (2024). Development of teaching modules in the implementation of the independent curriculum to improve the quality of the learning process and student learning outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(11), 9097–9105.
Jiang, B. (2022). Geography as a science of the Earth’s surface founded on the third view of space. Annals of GIS, 28(1), 31–43.
Jo, I., & Bednarz, S. W. (2014). Dispositions Toward Teaching Spatial Thinking Through Geography: Conceptualization and an Exemplar Assessment. Journal of Geography, 113(5), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2014.881409
Jo, I., & Hong-Dwyer, J. J. (2024). GIS learning and college students’ acquisition and understanding of spatial concepts. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 48(5), 763–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2023.2263748
Kerski, J. J. (2023). Teaching and Learning Geography with a Web GIS Approach. In A. Klonari, M. L. y Torres, & A. Kizos (Eds.), Re-visioning Geography: Supporting the SDGs in the post-COVID era (pp. 113–135). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40747-5_7
Kholoshyn, I. V., Bondarenko, O. V., Hanchuk, O. V., Varfolomyeyeva, I. M., & Panteleeva, N. B. (2025). Geospatial data in school geography courses: Sources, methodological features of use and implementation challenges. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 3105(1), 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/3105/1/012016
Koessoy, H. M., Rawis, J. A. M., Naharia, O., & Wullur, M. M. (2025). Implementation of digital spatial-based educational model innovation in high schools in the islands of North Sulawesi Province. International Journal of Information Technology and Education, 5(1), 208–244.
Lin, Q., Zhang, D., Wu, J., Fang, Y., Chen, X., & Lin, B. (2024). A Python analysis and visualization tool and library based on Kepler.gl for SWAT models. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 26(1), 189–202.
Meechandee, S., & Meekaew, N. (2025). Integrating phenomenon-based learning and GIS to improve geo-literacy and student engagement: An action research approach. Discover Education, 4(1), 91.
Mericskay, B. (2023). Explorer et visualiser des données spatiales avec kepler.gl et deck.gl. Journée d’étude du GdR MAGIS – La boîte à outils de cartographie et de géovisualisation de données: Regards croisés de chercheurs.
Nuralita, A. D. A., Subali, B., Nugroho, S. E., Wiyanto, W., & Yusof, M. M. M. (2025). Mapping project-based learning e-modules: A bibliometric and systematic literature review. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 11(2), 418–434.
Panjaitan, B. R., Ningrum, E., & Waluya, B. (2024). Digital learning tools in geography education: A systematic literature review. Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.55549/epess.1413355
Puastuti, D., & Sinthiya, I. A. P. A. (2021). A contextual approach to geography learning in school. JLCEdu (Journal of Learning and Character Education), 1(2), 83.
Purwanto, P., Utomo, D. H., Wiwoho, B. S., Susanto, A., Elvada, E., Purba, C. T., Zain, M. W. K., Maghfiroh, A., & Mellyana, I. M. (2025). GeoTPACK (Geographical Technology, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge) Strategi Meningkatkan Keterampilan Geografi Berkelanjutan. Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi Undiksha, 13(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpg.v13i1.85878
Razi, P. (2024). Development of e-module for independent learning of physics material based on independent curriculum. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(5), 761–769.
Sari, S. N., Anjarsari, I., Syifauddin, M., Kurniawan, E., & Mahat, H. (2025). Integrating GIS in classroom practice: Empirical evidence on what drives teachers to use geospatial technology. Architecture Image Studies, 6(4), 1405–1421.
Schulze, U. (2021). “GIS works!”—But why, how, and for whom? Findings from a systematic review. Transactions in GIS, 25(2), 768–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12704
Sitiningrum, D. S. (2024). The impact of urban density on the form and function of public spaces in sustainable city planning. Journal of Placemaking and Streetscape Design, 2(1), 65–80.
Spatioti, A. G., Kazanidis, I., & Pange, J. (2022). A comparative study of the ADDIE instructional design model in distance education. Information, 13(9), 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13090402
Statistik, B. P. (2024). Penduduk, laju pertumbuhan penduduk, distribusi persentase penduduk, kepadatan penduduk, dan rasio jenis kelamin penduduk menurut provinsi, 2024. Badan Pusat Statistik. https://www.bps.go.id
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan. Alfabeta.
Tomita, K. (2022). Visual design as a holistic experience: How students’ emotional responses to the visual design of instructional materials are formed. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(2), 469–502.
Yamauchi, H., Song, J., Oguchi, T., Ogura, T., & Iizuka, K. (2025). Evaluating digital map utilization and interpretation skills of students. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 14(2), 76.
Zain, M. W. K., Purwanto, P., & Wijiyono, W. (2025). Penerapan Geomedia Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berfikir Spasial Siswa di Sman 1 Gondanglegi. GEOGRAPHY : Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 13(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.31764/geography.v13i1.29005
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Corrie Teresia Purba, Purwanto Purwanto, Sumarmi Sumarmi, Moh. Wahyu Kurniawan Zain

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
- Authors who publish with JTP agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Licensing for Data Publication
Licensing for Data Publication
JTP use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)

.png)
