Archive of Our Own as an Informal Digital Learning Environment for English Vocabulary Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v13i1.19793Keywords:
Informal digital learning of English (IDLE), Archive of our own, EFL learners, Vocabulary learningAbstract
Vocabulary demands in higher education often exceed the English repertoire of Indonesian university students. Therefore, they need supplementary resources. While Informal Digital Learning of English (IDLE) is gaining traction, research on fanfiction-based practices within higher education contexts remains notably limited. Addressing this gap, this study examined how the fanfiction platform Archive of Our Own (AO3) functions as an IDLE environment for lexical development. Using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, data were collected from 30 university students via comprehensive questionnaires. Descriptive results indicated students primarily engaged with AO3 for enjoyment, perceiving it as highly beneficial for vocabulary growth and exposure to authentic English. Thematic analysis revealed that this lexical expansion occurred incidentally during reading, supported by autonomous strategies such as contextual inference, dictionary use, note-taking, and rereading. However, participants were tentative about AO3’s impact on understanding university-level texts, suggesting its value lies more in general vocabulary enhancement than in targeted academic instruction. This study contributes to IDLE research by illustrating how fanfiction integrates intrinsic motivation, incidental word acquisition, and learner autonomy. Pedagogically, AO3 can be considered a supplementary learning resource.
References
Argawati, N. O., & Suryani, L. (2020). Digital-based instruction: Chances and challenges in English language teaching context. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 9(4), 1138. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20579
Arono, A., Syahriman, S., Nadrah, N., Villia, A., & Susanti, E. (2021). Comparative study of digital literacy in language learning among Indonesian language education and English language education students in the new normal era. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Progressive Education (ICOPE 2020), 1–8. EAI. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.16-10-2020.2305230
Austin, F. C., & Santoso, W. (2023). Exploring the use of fanfiction as authentic materials in English language teaching: A perspective from a reading class. Prologue: Journal on Language and Literature, 9(2), 286–299. https://doi.org/10.36277/jurnalprologue.v9i2.128
Bai, Y. (2024). A mixed methods investigation of mobile-based language learning on EFL students’ listening, speaking, foreign language enjoyment, and anxiety. Sage Open, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241255554
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2010). Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001
Biseko, J. M. (2025). Vocabulary learning in EFL context: Do primary school English subject textbooks provide structured support? Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2455047
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dawadi, S. (2020). The thematic analysis approach: A step by step guide for ELT research practitioners. Journal of NELTA, 25(1–2), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v25i1-2.49731
Esperanzate, Ma. D. (2025). Teaching academic writing in English to ESL/EFL learners in higher education: A systematic review of strategies and challenges. Journal of Exceptional Multidisciplinary Research, 2(2), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.69739/jemr.v2i2.919
Fauzia Sari, D., & Sari, D. F. (2016). Authentic materials for learning English: A study on EFL students in Aceh. Studies in English Language and Education, 3(2), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.24815/SIELE.V3I2.4962
Fortuna, R. S., & Fortuna, R. S. (2025). Lowering the filter: The role of attitude in English language acquisition. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 25(3), 2274–2287. https://doi.org/10.30574/WJARR.2025.25.3.1020
Gamage, A. N. K. K. (2025). A comparative analysis of qualitative and mixed methods research: Strengths, limitations, and practical applications. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 25(3), 2040–2046. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.25.3.0947
Hartono, D. A., & Prima, S. A. B. (2021). The correlation between Indonesian university students’ receptive vocabulary knowledge and their reading comprehension level. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i1.34590
Kulakhmetova, G., & Daulbaeva, A. (2024). The impact of authentic materials on student motivation in EFL contexts. Educational Research Quarterly, 47(3), 23–39.
Kulakhmetova, M. S., & Daulbayeva, K. M. (2024). Authentic media materials by increasing motivation in foreign language teaching. Bulletin of Shokan Ualikhanov Kokshetau University Philological Series, (2), 248–259. https://doi.org/10.59102/kufil/2024/iss2pp248-259
Laoli, A., Giawa, N. H., Zebua, D. P. J., & Namo, E. F. J. (2025). Strategies and challenges of English education students in vocabulary mastery. Journal of English Language Teaching in Indonesia, 13(1).
Lee, J. S., Xie, Q., & Lee, K. (2024). Informal digital learning of English and L2 willingness to communicate: Roles of emotions, gender, and educational stage. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(2), 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2021.1918699
Lees, J., & Webb, G. (2018). A review of the literature to inform the development of a new model of global placement: The global learning partnership. Physical Therapy Reviews, 23(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2017.1341144
Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2013). Vocabulary size revisited: The link between vocabulary size and academic achievement. Applied Linguistics Review, 4(1), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2013-0007
Najeeb, S. S. R. (2013). Learner autonomy in language learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1238–1242. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2013.01.183
Ningrum, P. K., & Apoko, T. W. (2025). The impact of social media on English language learning: A mixed-methods study. International Journal of Research in Education, 5(2), 330–342. https://doi.org/10.26877/j656ns21
Nurlia, V. (2023). Reading authentic materials to enhance students’ vocabulary mastery. Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 6(2), 487–497. https://doi.org/10.33503/journey.v6i2.669
Oey-Gardiner, M., Rahardi, F., & Can, C. K. (2023). Ethics in social science research in Indonesia. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1153-0
Organization for Transformative Works. (2012). Archive of Our Own (AO3) | Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/item/lcwaN0026729
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Rahman, M. R. (2025). The correlation of digital literacy competence and learning motivation with social attitudes and self-efficacy in Indonesian teacher candidates following the COVID-19 pandemic. Dirosat: Journal of Islamic Studies, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.28944/dirosat.v10i1.2053
Raoofi, S., Chan, S. H., Mukundan, J., & Md Rashid, S. (2013). Metacognition and second/foreign language learning. English Language Teaching, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n1p36
Riazi, A. M. (2021). Mixed methods in language research. Routledge.
Rodríguez-Fornells, A., Cunillera, T., Mestres-Missé, A., & de Diego-Balaguer, R. (2009). Neurophysiological mechanisms involved in language learning in adults. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364(1536), 3711–3735. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0130
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2023). Research methods for business students (9th ed.). Pearson.
Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). How to construct a mixed methods research design. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(S2), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1
Septiani, A. D., Nasrullah, R., & Faridawati, F. (2024). EFL students’ metacognitive strategies in learning vocabulary. KLASIKAL: Journal of Education, Language Teaching and Science, 6(2), 419–431. https://doi.org/10.52208/klasikal.v6i2.1169
Surya, R., Pranoto, B. E., & Suprayogi, S. (2021). Fanfiction as an academic tool for advanced language fluency: A study. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12, 364–369. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i4.515
Taufiqurrohman, M., & Sofiana, N. (2025). DeepL app: Effect on students’ vocabulary mastery. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development, 6(2), 340–350. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v6i2.4880
Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806292430
Treve, M. (2023). Examining the impact of using authentic materials on ESL/EFL learners. International Journal of Empirical Research Methods, 40–50. https://doi.org/10.59762/ijerm205275791120231005151352
Vahed, A., & Rodriguez, K. (2021). Enriching students’ engaged learning experiences through the collaborative online international learning project. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(5), 596–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1792331
Verawati, M., Murtadho, F., & Utami, S. R. (2025). The transformation of digital literacy in Indonesian language learning for pharmacy students: A study on the use of Instagram as a multiliteracy evaluation medium. Proceedings of the International Seminar on Humanity, Education, and Language, 1(1), 1137–1144. https://doi.org/10.21009/ishel.v1i1.57080
Xu, W., & Zammit, K. (2020). Applying thematic analysis to education: A hybrid approach to interpreting data in practitioner research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920918810
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
Zhai, X., Liu, C., & Razali, A. B. (2021). Utilization of online fan-fiction to improve English literacy skills among EFL undergraduate students. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v10-i4/11678
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fauziyyah Mufida Suni, Margana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities “tacitly or explicitly“ of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1.jpg)
