Moral Schemata in L2 Politeness: Sasak and Balinese EFL Learners’ Pragmatic Transfer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v13i1.18533Keywords:
Interlanguage pragmatics, Moral schemata, Politeness strategies, Pragmatic transferAbstract
Research in interlanguage pragmatics (ILP) has increasingly recognized that politeness is shaped not only by linguistic knowledge but also by the cultural values learners bring to interaction. However, evidence from Southeast Asian contexts remains limited, restricting current understanding of how local value systems influence pragmatic transfer. This study investigates how Indonesian EFL learners from two ethnolinguistic groups, Sasak (n = 30) and Balinese (n = 30), realize politeness in apology and refusal speech acts and how first-language (L1) moral schemata influence their pragmatic choices. Adopting a convergent mixed-methods design, the study combines discourse completion tasks (DCTs) with semi-structured interviews to examine both pragmatic performance and learners’ underlying reasoning. The findings reveal clear differences between the two groups. Sasak learners showed a stronger tendency toward negative politeness strategies, reflecting the value of humility (andap asor), whereas Balinese learners more frequently employed indirect strategies associated with maintaining social harmony (rwa bhineda). These differences suggest that pragmatic transfer is influenced not only by language proficiency but also by culturally shaped understandings of appropriate social conduct. The results further indicate that learners draw on locally shared value systems when managing face and interpersonal relationships in English. The study contributes to ILP scholarship by providing evidence that politeness is closely linked to culturally informed moral reasoning and by extending discussions of facework beyond dominant Western and East Asian perspectives. It also highlights the importance of incorporating intercultural and values-based dimensions into pragmatics instruction, enabling learners to develop greater awareness of how different communities interpret and enact politeness in communication.
References
Alrefaee, Y. M. H. A., & Aljabr, F. (2025). Evolution and trends in interlanguage pragmatics research: A bibliometric analysis (1973–2024). Cogent Arts & Humanities, 12(1), 2567505. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2567505
Bella, G., Helm, P., Koch, G., & Giunchiglia, F. (2024). Tackling language modelling bias in support of linguistic diversity. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '24) (pp. 562–572). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3658925
Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1984). Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5(3), 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/5.3.196
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Clynes, A., & Dede, K. (2017). Balinese politeness and the principle of rwa bhineda. Journal of Pragmatics, 118, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.07.005
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2023). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
Erlinda, N. L. P. (2023). The manifestation of andap asor in the politeness strategies of Sasak EFL learners. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v13i2.67890
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193144
Fang, X. (2025). Pragmatic research in English as an Asian lingua franca: A systematic review. Applied Pragmatics, 7(1), 82–108. https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.22018.fan
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2023). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. In The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Ishihara, N. (2022). Methodological considerations in cross-cultural pragmatics research. Language Teaching, 55(4), 501–520. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444821000301
Ishihara, N., & Taguchi, N. (2022). Moral dimensions of pragmatic competence. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Kádár, D. Z. (2024). Ritual and language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108624909
Kitao, K. (2022). Politeness as moral self-discipline in Japanese L2 learning. Japanese Language and Literature, 56(1), 89–110.
Lee, Y. (2021). Confucian values and pragmatic transfer in Korean EFL learners. Pragmatics and Society, 12(3), 456–478. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.20012.lee
Li, S., & Taguchi, N. (2024). Sampling strategies in cross-cultural pragmatics research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 44, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719052400001X
Mahyuni, L. P. (2006). Andap asor: The core of Sasak politeness. Budaya Jawa, 7(2), 112–125.
Ren, W., & Han, Y. (2023). Chinese politeness and intercultural communication. In R. Chen (Ed.), Chinese politeness: Diachrony, variation, and universals (pp. 150–175). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Roever, C. (2022). Teaching and testing second language pragmatics and interaction: From research to practice. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Roever, C., & Kasper, G. (2021). Assessing interlanguage pragmatics. In N. Taguchi & Y. Kim (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics (pp. 255–275). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Sanjaya, I. N. S. (2023). Indonesian EFL learners’ motivation to learn second language pragmatics. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.25134/ijefl.v8i1.6789
Sánchez-Hernández, A., Taguchi, N., & Roever, C. (2024). Integrating moral cognition into L2 pragmatic development research. Language Teaching Research, 28(4), 789–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231187654
Sato, T., & McLean, J. E. (2023). Statistical analysis in interlanguage pragmatics: Dealing with non-normal data. System, 118, Article 103201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103201
Taguchi, N. (2023). Technology-enhanced language learning and L2 pragmatics: Insights from digital game-based pragmatics instruction. Language Teaching, 56(2), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444822000237
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C. (2023). Second language pragmatics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Wang, Y., & Ren, W. (2024). L2 grit and pragmatic comprehension among Chinese postgraduate learners: Enjoyment and anxiety as mediators. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(1), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12489
Wei, H. (2022). Non-parametric alternatives for analyzing speech act data in interlanguage pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 198, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.07.008
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ni Wayan Prami Wahyudiantari, Arif Rahman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities “tacitly or explicitly“ of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1.jpg)
