METAKOGNITIF, PROSES SAINS, DAN KEMAMPUAN KOGNITIF MAHASISWA DIVERGEN DAN KONVERGEN DALAM PBL

Yusran Khery, Subandi Subandi, Suhadi Ibnu

Abstract


The purpose of this study was: (1) determine differences in metacognitive awareness and cognitive abilities of students who learned with PBL and conventional strategies, (2) determine differences in metacognitive awareness, science process skills, and cognitive abilities among students with divergent thinking and character convergent strategies are learned with PBL. This study uses three different kinds of design that is descriptive research design, quasi-experimental design, and pre-experimental design to answer the research objectives numbered one through three in a row. The instrument used in this study were: (1) questionnaire divergent thinking and convergent character, (2) metacognitive awareness questionnaire, (3) observation sheets science process skills, and (4) tests of cognitive ability. Data were analyzed by inferential statistics. The results showed that: (1) there is no difference in metacognitive awareness and cognitive skills of students with learning strategies derived from PBL and conventional strategies, (2) there are no differences in metacognitive awareness and cognitive abilities among students divergent and convergent. Science process skills students better than the divergent-convergent.

Keywords


metacognitive awareness, the process of science, cognitive abilities, character thinks, PBL.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akinoglu, O., & Tandogan, R.O. 2007. The Effects of Problem-Based Active Learning in Science Education on Students Academic Achievement, Attitude, and Concept Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(1): 71-81.

Alamolhodaei, H. 2001. Convergent/Divergent Cognitive Styles and Mathematical Problem Solving. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in South East Asia, 24(2): 102-117.

Azwar, S. 2010. Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Barrett, T., Mac Labhrainn, I., Fallon, H. (Eds). 2005. Handbook of Inquiry & Problem Based Learning. Galway: CELT.

Bilgin, I., Senocak, E. & Sozbilir, M. 2009.The Effects of Problem-Based Learning Instruction on University Students Performance of Conceptual and Quantitative Problems in Gas Concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(2): 153-164.

Danial, M. 2010. Menumbuhkembangkan Kesadaran dan Keterampilan Metakognisi Mahasiswa Jurusan Biologi melalui Penerapan Strategi PBL dan Kooperatif GI. Bioedukasi, 1(2).

Danili, E., & Reid, N. 2006. Cognitive Factors that can Potentially Affect Pupil’s Test Performance. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(2): 64-83.

De Bono, E. 1970. Berpikir Lateral. Terjemahan oleh Sutoyo. 1991. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Downing, K. 2010. Problem-Based Learning and Metacognition. Asian Journal on Education & Learning, 1(2): 75-96.

Effendy. 1985. Pengaruh Pengajaran Ilmu Kimia dengan Cara Inkuairi Terbimbing dan dengan Cara Verifikasi terhadap Perkembangan Intelek dan Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa IKIP Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia Tahun Pertama. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Jakarta: Fakultas Pascasarjana Institut Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Jakarta.

Ibnu, S., Mukhadis, A., & Dasna, I W. 2003. Dasar-dasar metodologi Penelitian. Malang: Penerbit Universitas Negeri Malang.

Ibnu, S. 2009. Kaidah Dasar Pembelajaran Sains. Makalah disajikan dalam kuliah Landasan Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran IPA, PPS Universitas Negeri Malang, PSSJ Pendidikan IPA (RSBI), Malang, 18 Mei.

Kaberman , Z., & Dori, Y.J. 2009. Metacognition in Chemical Education: Question Posing in The Case-Based Computerized Learning Environment. Instructional Science, (37): 403–436.

Khasanah, D.N. 2010. Peningkatan Kesadaran metakognitif Dengan Menggunakan Metode SQ3R Pada Pembelajaran Biologi Siswa Kelas VIIA SMP Muhammadiyah 2 Surakarta Tahun Pelajaran 2009/2010. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Surakarta: Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Krishnaswamy, N.R. 1996. Learning Organic Chemistry Through Natural Products: A Practical Approach. Resonance, hlm. 25-33.

Kurniawan, A. 2011. SPSS Serba-serbi Analisis Statistika dengan Cepat dan Mudah. Indonesia: Jasakom.

Kusuma, E., & Saidi, K. 2010. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Kimia Berorientasi Chemo-Entrepreneurship untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan kognitif dan Life Skill Mahasiwa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 4(1).

Mc Donnell, C., O’Connor, C. & Seery, M.K. 2007. Developing Practical Chemistry Skills by Means of Student-Driven Problem Based Learning Mini Projects. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2): 130-139.

Messick S., 1993, The Matter of Style: Manifestations of Personality in Cognition, Learning, and Teaching, Princeton NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Mölle, M., Marshall, L., Wolf, B., Fehm, H.L., & Born, J. 1999. EEG Complexity And Performance Measures of Creative Thinking. Psychophysiology, (36): 95–104.

Muzani, J.S. 2011. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Mata Kuliah Inovasi Pendidikan dengan Model EDDIE. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Program Pascasarjana Program Studi Teknologi Pembelajaran Universitas Negeri Malang.

Odubunmi, O., & Balogun, T.A. 1991. The effect of laboratory and lecture teaching methods on cognitive achievement in integrated science. Editor Ronald G. Good. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(3):213 - 224.

Partanto, P. A. & Al Barry, M. D. 1994. Kamus Ilmiah Populer. Surabaya: Penerbit Arloka Surabaya.

Pavelich, M.J. 1982. Using General Chemistry to Promote the Higher Level Thinking Abilities. Journal of Chemical Education, 59(9): 721-724.

Phang, F.A. & Seth. 2011. Qualitative Techniques in Metacognition in Physics Problem Solving Among Secondary Schools Students in Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia, (Online), (http://web1.fp.utm.my/seminar/7.QRAM05/Session1/9.FatinAliah&Seth-UTM.pdf, diakses 6 Juni 2011).

Ram, P. 1999. Problem-Based Learning In Undergraduate Education A Sophomore Chemistry Laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(8): 1122-1126.

Schraw, G. & Dennison, R.S. 1994. Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psyshology, (18): 460-875

Senocak, E., Taskesenligil, Y., & Sozbilir, M. 2007. A Study on Teaching Gases to Prospective Primary Science Teachers Through Problem-Based Learning. Research in Science Education, (37): 279–290.

Stanley, C. 1995. Differences in Divergent Thinking as a Function of Handedness and Sex. The American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 108, Iss. 3, hlm. 311.

Suardana, I.N. 2006. Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Dengan Pendekatan Kooperatif Berbantuan Modul Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Proses Dan Kemampuan kognitif Mahasiswa Pada Perkuliahan Kimia Fisika I. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran IKIP Negeri Singaraja, (4): 239-256.

Subali, B. 2009. Pengembangan Tes Pengukur Keterampilan Proses Sains Pola Divergen Mata Pelajaran Biologi SMA. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Biologi, Lingkungan dan Pembelajarannya, Jurdik Biologi, FMIPA, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, 4 Juli, hlm. 581-593.

Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.

Susiwi, Hinduan, A.A., Liliasari, & Ahmad, S. 2009. Analisis Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa SMA pada “Model Pembelajaran Praktikum D-E-H”. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 14(2): 87-104.

Syahid, A. 2003. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Mata Kuliah Rancangan Pembelajaran dengan Menerapkan Model Elaborasi. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Malang: Program Pascasarjana Program Studi Teknologi Pembelajaran Universitas Negeri Malang.

Tarhan, L. Ayar-Kayali, H., Urek, R.O., & Acar, B. 2008. Problem-Based Learning in 9th Grade Chemistry Class: ‘Intermolecular Forces’. Research in Science Education, (38): 285–300.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v1i1.517

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2013 Yusran Khery, Subandi Subandi, Suhadi Ibnu

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
J-PS (Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram) p-ISSN (print) 2338-4530, e-ISSN (online) 2540-7899 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats