Five-Level Conception Diagnostic Test on Electromagnetic Induction Concepts: Feasibility Test and Overview of Students' Concept Understanding Level

Nila Apriliyanti, Frida Ulfah Ermawati

Abstract


During the Physics learning process, students often have difficulty in understanding the concepts, such as Electromagnetic Induction concepts. For example, students assumed that a loop in a magnetic field B whose coil plane area shrinks towards the page produces a constant induced electromotive force. However, the truth is when the surface area of the loop is reduced, the induced electromotive force produced gets smaller. This contradiction is called a misconception. This misconception should be detected immediately using a diagnostic test of conception, especially the five-level diagnostic test. This paper is intended to report the results of the writing of a five-level conception diagnostic test for Electromagnetic Induction concepts, to test its’ feasibility (validity and reliability) and to get an overview of the several students’ understanding level as well as to identify the most dominant internal factors that cause students' misconceptions on the concepts. A total of 11 questions on the diagnostic test is validated and reliable therefore it can be used to test students' understanding level. The results of the internal validity test are 92% (very valid) and the external content validity in terms of true fake and wrong fake values are 3.94% and 5.45%, the construct external validity (rxy=0.591) > rtable=0.3061 and the reliability [ r11=0.608 (very reliable)]. Among 14 students who were tested for their level of understanding 44.16% of them experienced a lack of knowledge.

Keywords


Electromagnetic Induction, five-level conception diagnostic test, feasibility test, understanding level

Full Text:

PDF Plagiarism Result

References


Aisahsari, R., & Ermawati, F. U. (2019). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Four-Tier Diagnostik Test untuk Materi Arus Listrik Searah. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 08(02), 565–568.

Amin, N., Wiendartun, & Samsudin, A. (2016). Analisis Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Dynamic-Fluid Conceptual Change Inventory (DFCCI) Bentuk Four-Tier Test pada Beberapa SMA di Bandung Raya. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Inovasi dan Pembelajaran (SNIPS) 2016, 1(1), 570–574.

Anam, R. S., Widodo, A., Sopandi, W., & Wu, H. K. (2019). Developing a five-tier diagnostic test to identify students’ misconceptions in science: an example of the heat transfer concepts. Elementary Education Online, 18(3), 1014–1029. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2019.609690.

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik: Edisi Revisi. PT. Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, S. (2016). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi 2). PT. Bumi Aksara.

Bayuni, T. C., Sopandi, W., & Sujana, A. (2018). Identification misconception of primary school teacher education students in changes of matters using a five-tier diagnostic test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012086.

Dikmenli, M. (2010). Misconceptions of cell division held by student teachers in biology: A drawing analysis. Scientific Research and Essays, 5(2), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.5897/SRE.9000654.

Ermawati, F. U., Anggrayni, S., & Isfara, L. (2019). Misconception profile of students in senior high school iv Sidoarjo East Java in work and energy concepts and the causes evaluated using Four-Tier Diagnostic Test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1387(1), 0–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1387/1/012062.

Fajriyyah, N. S., & Ermawati, F. U. (2020). The Validity and Reliability Of Five-Tier Conception Diagnostic Test For Kinetic Theory Of Gases. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 09(02), 126–132.

Firdaus, N. R., Kirana, T., & Susantini, E. (2021). A Four-tier Test to Identify Students’ Conceptions in Inheritance Concepts. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 2(4), 402–415. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v2i4.128.

Giancoli, D. C. (2014). Physics: Principles with Applications (7th Edition). Boston: Pearson. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118032992.ch2.

Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A Review and Comparison of Diagnostic Instruments to Identify Students’ Misconceptions in Science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a.

Hanifah, L., & Ermawati, F. U. (2019). The Validity and Reliability of Four-Tier Format Misconception Diagnostic Test Instrument for Momentum and Impulse Concepts. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 08(02), 575–578.

Isfara, L., & Ermawati, F. U. (2018). Validitas Instrumen Four-Tier Misconception Diagnostic Test untuk Materi Fluida Statis. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 07(03), 429–433.

Jannah, E. M., & Ermawati, F. U. (2019). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Berformat Four-Tier untuk Materi Dinamika Rotasi dan Kesetimbangan Benda Tegar. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 08(02), 560–564.

Jannah, E. M., & Ermawati, F. U. (2020). Identify 11th Grade of Senior High School Jogoroto students’ misconceptions on Dynamic Rotation and Rigid Body Equilibrium concepts using Four-Tier Diagnostic Test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1491(1), 0–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1491/1/012010.

Kiray, S. A., & Simsek, S. (2021). Determination and Evaluation of the Science Teacher Candidates’ Misconceptions About Density by Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Test. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(5), 935–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10087-5.

Kirbulut, Z. D., & Geban, O. (2014). Using three-tier diagnostic test to assess students’ misconceptions of states of matter. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5), 509–521. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1128a.

Köse, S. (2008). Diagnosing student misconceptions: Using drawings as a research method. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(2), 283–293. http://idosi.org/wasj/wasj3(2)/20.pdf.

Kurniawati, D. M., & Ermawati, F. U. (2020). Analysis Students’ Conception Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Test for Dynamic Fluid Concepts. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1491(1), 0–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1491/1/012012.

Lailiyah, S., & Ermawati, F. U. (2020). Materi Gelombang Bunyi: Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Konsepsi Berformat Five-Tier, Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas serta Uji Terbatas. JPFT (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online), 8(3), 104–119.

Maharani, L., Rahayu, D. I., Amaliah, E., Rahayu, R., & Saregar, A. (2019). Diagnostic Test with Four-Tier in Physics Learning: Case of Misconception in Newton’s Law Material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012022.

Pertiwi, C. A., & Setyarsih, W. (2015). Konsepsi Siswa Tentang Pengaruh Gaya pada Gerak Benda Menggunakan Instrumen Force Concept Inventory (FCI) Termodifikasi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika (JIPF), 04(02), 162–168.

Putri, W. K., & Ermawati, F. U. (2021). Pengembangan, Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Tes Diagnostik Five-Tier untuk Materi Getaran Harmonis Sederhana beserta Hasil Uji Coba Terbatasnya. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.5.1.92-101.

Qonita, M., & Ermawati, F. U. (2020). The Validity and Reliability of Five-Tier Conception Diagnostic Test for Vector Concepts. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 09(03), 459–465.

Ramadhani, N. N., & Ermawati, F. U. (2021). Five-Tier Diagnostic Test Instrument for Uniform Circular Motion Concepts: Development, Validity, Reliability and Limited Trials. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 9(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v9i1.4763.

Riduwan & Akdon. (2013). Rumus dan Data dalam Analisis Statistika. Alfabeta.

Rohmanasari, F., & Ermawati, F. U. (2019). Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Miskonsepsi Berformat Four-Tier Pada Materi Alat Optik. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 8(2), 556–559.

Sadhu, S., Tima, M. T., Cahyani, V. P., Laka, A. F., Annisa, D., & Fahriyah, A. R. (2017). Analysis of acid-base misconceptions using modified certainty of response index (CRI) and diagnostic interview for different student levels cognitive. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 1(2), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v1i2.5126.

Salsabila, F. N., & Ermawati, F. U. (2020). Validity and Reliability of Conception Diagnostic Test Using Five Tier Format for Elasticity Concepts. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 09(03), 439–446.

Sari, I. P. M., & Ermawati, F. U. (2021). Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Konsepsi Lima Tingkat pada Materi Gerak Lurus: Pengembangan, Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas serta Uji Coba Terbatas. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 5(2), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.5.2.152-162.

Serway, R. A., & Jewett, J. W. (2004). Physics for Scientists and Engineers (6th Edition). New York: Pearson Addison Wesley.

Sugiyono. (2015). Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tumanggor, A. M. R., Supahar, Ringo, E. S., & Harliadi, M. D. (2020). Detecting Students’ Misconception in Simple Harmonic Motion Concepts Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Instruments. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 9(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v9i1.4571.

Utari, J. I., & Ermawati, F. U. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Miskonsepsi Berformat Four-Tier untuk Materi Suhu, Kalor dan Perpindahannya. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 07(03), 434–439.

Wulandari. (2017). Analisis Penguasaan Konsep Induksi Elektromagnetik pada Siswa Kelas XII SMA. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika, 2, 1–5.

Yang, D., & Lin, Y. (2015). Assessing 10-to 11-year-old children’s performance and misconceptions in number sense using a four-tier diagnostic test. Educational Research, 57(4), 368–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2015.1085235.

Young, H. D., & Freedman, R. A. (2013). University Physics with Modern Physics 13th Edition. New York: PearsonAddison Wesley.

Yustiandi, & Saepuzaman, D. (2017). Identifikasi Kesulitan dalam Pembelajaran Konsep Induksi Elektromagnetik di SMA. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan FKIP UNTIRTA, 71–74.

Zahra, Y., & Suprapto, N. (2019). Analisis Kualitas Instrumen Four-Tier Diagnostic Test untuk Mengidentifikasi Profil Konsepsi Siswa pada Materi Teori Kinetik Gas. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 08(03), 830–834.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v10i1.4658

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2022 Nila Apriliyanti, Frida Ulfah Ermawati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
J-PS (Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram) p-ISSN (print) 2338-4530, e-ISSN (online) 2540-7899 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats