Evaluating Character Education Implementation in Elementary Schools : A Kirkpatrick Model Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v12i4.16733Keywords:
Character Education, Program Evaluation, Kirkpatrick ModelAbstract
This study aims to evaluate the implementation of character education at SDN 015 Balikpapan Selatan using the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model, which comprises four levels: reaction, learning, behavior, and result. The research was motivated by the need to reinforce character values after the COVID-19 pandemic, which led to a decline in students' positive behaviors due to prolonged online learning. A mixed-method approach with an explanatory sequential design was employed. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaires from 89 students (grades II-VI), while qualitative data were obtained through interviews, observations, and document analysis. The data analysis employed a simple quantitative descriptive approach using Microsoft Excel to calculate percentage scores and categorize them into five levels (very high, high, moderate, low, and very low) based on the Kirkpatrick evaluation model. Qualitative data from interviews, observations, and documents were narratively integrated to support and enrich the findings. The findings revealed that the reaction stage achieved an average score of 90.87%, the learning stage 88.24%, and the behavior stage 88.07%, all within the very high category. At the result stage, character education was found to have a positive long-term impact on students' learning motivation, social behaviors, and engagement both at school and at home. The program successfully fostered student discipline, independence, empathy, and moral conduct. However, challenges remain in achieving consistent internalization of character values, particularly outside the school environment. Overall, the study concludes that character education at SDN 015 Balikpapan has been effectively implemented and significantly contributes to shaping students' character, although ongoing improvement is needed through more collaborative strategies involving both schools and parents.
References
Alsalamah, A., & Callinan, C. (2021). Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s four-level model of training criteria to evaluate training programmes for head teachers. Education Sciences, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030116
Arthur, J. (2014). Handbook of Moral and Character Education (L. Nucci & D. Narvaez, Eds.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203114896
Azmy, A., & Setiarini, N. Y. (2023). Kirkpatrick Model as Evaluation Training Program for Assessor: Case Study of Government Employee. International Journal of Management, Accounting and Economics, 10(9), 2383–2126. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10115328
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard University Press.
Chan, G. H., Lee, G. K. W., Kong, C. Y. W., & Lo, T. W. (2022). An Innovative Model of Positive Education with Traditional Chinese Moral Values: An Evaluation of Project Bridge. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(7), 3797. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19073797
Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting Style as Context: An Integrative Model. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 487–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.487
Dwikurnaningsih, Y., Waruwu, M., & Wardani, K. W. (2022). A Combination of Context Input Process Product and Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model to Determine the Effectiveness of E-Training for Principals during COVID-19 Pandemic. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(4), 2087–2100. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.4.2087
Ferrara, K. M. (2019). The Effectiveness of Character Education on Student Behaviour. https://rdw.rowan.edu/etd
Fuentes, J. L., & Sánchez-Pérez, Y. (2024). The complexity of ethical assessment: Interdisciplinary challenge for character education. In Nursing Ethics (Vol. 31, Issue 1, pp. 65–78). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330231197710
Heriyanto, Achmad Kurniady, D., & Nurdin. (2024). Evaluation of Character Education Program on Improving Students’ Character at SMPK BPK Penabur Bandung. JUPIIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 16(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.24114/jupiis.v16i2.61291
Johnson, K., Mcgrath, R. E., Bier, M., Brown, M., & Berkowitz, M. W. (2022). A Meta-Analysis of the What Works in Character Education Research. In Journal of Character Education (Vol. 18, Issue 1). https://www.proquest.com/openview/b28fd0c66a8ee09866b9dc9286692ef1/1?cbl=27598&pq-origsite=gscholar
Kemendikbud. (2022). Profil Pelajar Pancasila dalam Kurikulum Merdeka .
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1998). The Four Levels of Evaluation. In Evaluating Corporate Training: Models and Issues (pp. 95–112). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4850-4_5
Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. https://bkconnection.com/static/Evaluating_Training_Programs_EXCERPT.pdf
Lickona, T. (2004). How to Help Our Children Develop Good Judgment, Integrity, and Other Essential Virtues. Atria Paperback.
Mashlihuddin, Y. (2018). Degradasi Moral Remaja Indonesia. P2KK UMM.
Murcahyanto, H., & Mohzana, M. (2023). Evaluation of Character Education Program Based on School Culture. IJE : Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 1(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.61277/ije.v1i1.8
Orchard, J., & Reiss, M. J. (2024). ‘Owning’ Climate Change for Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2024.2418142
Puccino, L. (2019). Influence of Character Education on Student Character Growth: A Program Evaluation.
Quinton, M. L., Tidmarsh, G., Parry, B. J., & Cumming, J. (2022). A Kirkpatrick Model Process Evaluation of Reactions and Learning from My Strengths Training for LifeTM. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811320
Ramadhan, M. A., Sumarsono, R. A., Achmad, A. A., & Cisse, A. (2022). Implementation of Kirkpatrick evaluation model in Building Information Modeling (BIM) training program. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v28i2.43555
Setiawan, D., Rahman, A., & Ramadhan, I. (2019). Pengaruh Media Sosial terhadap Akhlak Siswa. Mozaic : Islam Nusantara, 5(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.47776/mozaic.v5i1.133
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suryadi, F. L. P., & Wardani, K. W. (2024). Evaluasi Implementasi Program Pendidikan Karakter di Sekolah Dasar Menggunakan CIPP. School Education Journal PGSD FIP Unimed, 14(1 JUNI), 12. https://doi.org/10.24114/sejpgsd.v14i1.58251
Tohri, A., Rasyad, A., Sururuddin, M., & Istiqlal, L. M. (2022). The urgency of Sasak local wisdom-based character education for elementary school in East Lombok, Indonesia. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(1), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i1.21869
Tuhuteru, L., Pratiwi, E. Y. R., Suryowidiyanti, T., Mahendika, D., & Abdullah, D. (2023). Strategies For Primary School Students Understanding Of Character Education Through The Active Role Of Teachers. Journal on Education, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i4.2365
Velez, C. (2023). Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Character Education Program in a Small City School: Investigating Student Perceptions of School Climate and Program Implementation. https://www.proquest.com/openview/eb4b72ef1132f5abc8214a96422c814a/1?cbl=18750&diss=y&pq-origsite=gscholar
Wage INY, Atmaja, N., & Sriartha, I. (2020). Evaluasi Efektifitas Program Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter Ditinjau dari Context, Input, Process dan Product. Jurnal Pendidikan IPS Indonesia, 4. https://doi.org/10.23887/pips.v4i2.3401
Zurqoni, Retnawati, H., Apino, E., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018). Impact of character education implementation: A goal-free evaluation. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(6), 881–899. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/18.76.881
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Jurnal Paedagogy agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
-
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)