Modification of The Online Gunning Fog Index for Readability Analysis of Indonesian Texts : A Prototype Development

Juliana Tirza Mangilaleng, Hananto Hananto, Eklesia Khesywani Gea

Abstract


This study aims to develop a statistical formula for the readability of Indonesian texts by modifying the Gunning Fog Index (GFI) formula. GFI is one of the objective readability statistics with a syntactic approach. The GFI formula is used to measure the readability of text based on the calculation of the number of words, sentences and complex words. The underlying theory is that a good text is a text that is appropriate or easily understood by its target readers. The level of text readability is influenced by the syntactic complexity in the text. The research method used is R&D (Research and Development). The formula is made online using Google Sheets so that the link can be accessed by the public. The developed formula uses complex word count criteria that have been adapted from the Gunning Fog Index formula. The basis of this modification is that the original GFI criteria is based on English text which is different from Indonesian text. This formula was tested using the same text sample as the text sample used by previous researchers. Data dianalisis dengan perhitungan GFI untuk jumlah kata kompleks dalam kalima. The results of this study show a more detailed difference in the Gunning Fox index. In addition, this formula provides more detailed and informative calculations that make it easier for users to analyze the readability of Indonesian texts. This study's findings provide an improved tool for evaluating the readability of Indonesian texts, offering educators, writers, and literacy enthusiast a more accurate and accessible method to assess and enhance text comprehension for Indonesian readers.


Keywords


Text Readability; Gunning Fog Index; Indonesia Language.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Az-Zahra, F., & Romadhony, A. (2023). Text Readability Analysis for Indonesian School Textbook. 2023 International Conference on Data Science and Its Applications, ICoDSA 2023, 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoDSA58501.2023.10277302

Biddinika, M. K., Lestari, R. P., Indrawan, B., Yoshikawa, K., Tokimatsu, K., & Takahashi, F. (2016). Measuring the readability of Indonesian biomass websites: The ease of understanding biomass energy information on websites in the Indonesian language. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 1349–1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.078

Brysbaert, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. (2018). The Word Frequency Effect in Word Processing: An Updated Review. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417727521

Cahyawijaya, S., Winata, G. I., Wilie, B., Vincentio, K., Li, X., Kuncoro, A., Ruder, S., Lim, Z. Y., Bahar, S., Khodra, M. L., Purwarianti, A., & Fung, P. (2021). IndoNLG: Benchmark and Resources for Evaluating Indonesian Natural Language Generation. In EMNLP 2021 - 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings (pp. 8875–8898). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.699

Choi, S., Park, E., Byun, T., Ha, M., & Ryu, S. (2024). Analysis of the Readability Characteristics of Educational Text: based on Texts in Korean Language, Social Studies, and Science. Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 27(1), 87–131. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2024.27.1.87

Coggins, J. V. (2023). Using Readable English leads to reading gains for rural elementary students: An experimental study. PLoS ONE, 18(7 July). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288292

Dewi, S., & Adijaya, N. (2022). Readability analysis of teaching materials of English courses class 2 and 6 elementary school. LADU: Journal of Languages and Education, 2(3), 121–124. https://doi.org/10.56724/ladu.v2i3.120

Divo Pratama Pasaribu, Muhammad Faisal Hajmi Bin Nasir, Najla Regar, Nadila Adelia Putri, & Yani Lubis. (2024). Identify and Analyze Various Types of English Syllables. Sintaksis : Publikasi Para Ahli Bahasa Dan Sastra Inggris, 2(4), 09–22. https://doi.org/10.61132/sintaksis.v2i4.747

Elbro, C., Borstrøm, B., & Petersen, D. (2021). Simplification of Text and Its Impact on Reading Fluency in Young Learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(3), 450–465. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000487

Febriana, I., Wulandari, A. N., & Sari, Y. (2022). Keterbacaan Buku Teks Kurikulum Merdeka Bahasa Indonesia Kelas 7 Dengan Grafik Fry. In Basastra (Vol. 11, Issue 2). pdfs.semanticscholar.org. https://doi.org/10.24114/bss.v11i2.38197

Gerth, S., & Festman, J. (2021). Reading development, word length and frequency effects: An eye-tracking study with slow andfast readers. Frontiers in Communication, 6(September), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.743113

Gómez, P. C., & Sánchez-Lafuente, Á. A. (2019). Readability indices for the assessment of textbooks: A feasibility study in the context of EFL. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(May 2019), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.35869/VIAL.V0I16.92

Ho, C. S. H., Fong, C. Y. C., & Zheng, M. (2019). Contributions of vocabulary and discourse-level skills to reading comprehension among Chinese elementary school children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(2), 323–349. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716418000590

Jagaiah, T., Olinghouse, N. G., & Kearns, D. M. (2020). Syntactic complexity measures: variation by genre, grade-level, students’ writing abilities, and writing quality. Reading and Writing, 33(10), 2577–2638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10057-x

Kadayat, B. B., & Eika, E. (2020). Impact of sentence length on the readability of web for screen reader users. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 12188 LNCS, 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49282-3_18

Kuperman, V., Schroeder, S., & Gnetov, D. (2024). Word length and frequency effects on text reading are highly similar in 12 alphabetic languages. Journal of Memory and Language, 135, 104497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2023.104497

Larbi, C. C., Djaber, R., & Ismail, H. (2023). Gunning Fog Index and Automated UML Generation ROUABHIA Djaber Gunning Fog Index and Automated UML Generation. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3597953/v1

Lines, N. A. (2022). The Past, Problems, and Potential of Readability Analysis. Chance, 35(2), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09332480.2022.2066411

O’Sullivan, L., Sukumar, P., Crowley, R. K., McAuliffe, E., & Doran, P. (2020). Readability and understandability of clinical research patient information leaflets and consent forms in Ireland and the UK: a retrospective quantitative analysis. BMJ Open, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJOPEN-2020-037994

Pitler, E., & Nenkova, A. (2008). Revisiting Readability: A Unified Framework for Predicting Text Quality. 186–195. https://doi.org/10.3115/1613715.1613742

Prastyo, A. T., & Inayati, I. N. (2022). Implementasi Budaya Literasi Digital Untuk Menguatkan Moderasi Beragama Bagi Santri (Studi Kasus Di Mahad Uin Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang). INCARE, International Journal of Educational Resources, 2(6), 665–683. https://www.ejournal.ijshs.org/index.php/incare/article/view/361

Rahman, A., & Kartika, R. (2021). Keterbacaan Informasi Naratif Laporan Tahunan dan Cash Holdings. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 6(1), 163. https://doi.org/10.23887/jia.v6i1.29886

Rastle, K. (2018). Visual Word Recognition. In S.-A. Rueschemeyer & M. G. Gaskell (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 47–70). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198786825.013.3

Research on Text Readability Based on Computer Multi-Level Comprehensive Evaluation Model and Algorithm Optimization. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/cipae55637.2022.00074

Sahiruddin. (2022). Textual Syntactic Complexity and Its Role In Second Language Reading Outcomes In Indonesia. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 6(2), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v6i2.1268

Saptono, D., Fitrianingsih, Ningsih, T. W. R., & Sampurna, T. M. (2013). Readability Test. 5(4), 8–9.

Spencer, M., Gilmour, A. F., Miller, A. C., Emerson, A. M., Saha, N. M., & Cutting, L. E. (2019). Understanding the influence of text complexity and question type on reading outcomes. Reading and Writing, 32(3), 603–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9883-0

Tirza, J., & Hananto. (2024). ANALISIS KETERBACAAN TEKS BAHASA INDONESIA DENGAN PROGRAM MICROSOFT WORD. Artes Liberales, 1(1), 72–83.

Wilkinson, P. A., & Patty, D. (1993). The Effects of Sentence Combining on the Reading Comprehension of Fourth Grade Students. Research in the Teaching of English, 27(1), 104–125. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte199315423

Yaffe, P. (2022). Fog index. Ubiquity, 2022, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568307

Zang, C., Fu, Y., Bai, X., Yan, G., & Liversedge, S. P. (2018). Investigating word length effects in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(12), 1831–1841. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000589

Zhiqin, Z. (2024). On Syntactic Complexity in English Language. Education, Society and Human Studies, 5(2), p25. https://doi.org/10.22158/eshs.v5n2p25




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v12i2.14983

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Paedagogy

ISSN: 2722-4627 (Online)

Published by Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan dan Psikologi (FIPP)

Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika (UNDIKMA)

Email: [email protected]

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.