Microlearning Videos for Green Knowledge Development: Feasibility, Learning Changes, and Cross-Case Patterns in Indonesian Vocational Education

Authors

  • Mustika Nuramalia Handayani Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Najib Tuisina Naenum Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Nadia Trianisawati Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v12i3.22311

Keywords:

Microlearning Videos, Green Knowledge, Vocational Education, Agribusiness Education, Sustainable Food Processing

Abstract

This study aims to describe the characteristics and assess the feasibility of videos used in Indonesia’s Agribusiness Processing of Agricultural Products (APHP) program, examine changes in students’ green knowledge within each case, and identify common and contrasting patterns of green-knowledge development across the two cases. A quantitative descriptive approach with comparative multiple-case secondary analysis was used. Both cases followed the ADDIE model but differed in content, participants, instructional models, implementation periods, and assessment instruments. Product feasibility was assessed through expert validation and student-response questionnaires. Cognitive outcomes were measured using multiple-choice pretests and posttests completed by 31 students in Case 1 and 25 students in Case 2. Six experts reviewed the mapping of the test items to six common green-knowledge domains. In Case 1, expert-validation scores ranged from 83.33% to 86.11%, and student practicality was 79.41%; in Case 2, expert-validation scores ranged from 75.00% to 95.14%, and student practicality was 83.98%. Green-knowledge scores increased from 32.26% to 68.87% in Case 1 and from 69.20% to 82.40% in Case 2, producing moderate normalized gains of 0.54 and 0.43. These results do not show that one instructional combination was superior. Instead, they illustrate two context-specific uses of microlearning: discovery activities for exploring broad environmental issues and project work for connecting sustainability with processing operations. By placing different topic-based tests within one framework, this study provides a practical basis for examining green knowledge across vocational food-processing subjects.

References

Abidin, R. Z. (2025). Analysis of Microlearning Effectiveness in enhancing 21st Century skills. Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education, 6(3), 177-185.

Al-Zahrani, A. M. (2024). Enhancing postgraduate students’ learning outcomes through Flipped Mobile-Based Microlearning. Research in Learning Technology, 32.

Alias, N. F., & Razak, R. A. (2025). Revolutionizing learning in the digital age: A systematic literature review of microlearning strategies. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(1), 1-21.

Boumalek, K., Bakki, A., El Mezouary, A., Hmedna, B., & Eddahibi, M. (2026). Micro-learning design and micro-course structuring: a systematic literature review. Interactive Learning Environments, 34(4), 2411-2437.

Cabral, C., & Dhar, R. L. (2021). Green competencies: insights and recommendations from a systematic literature review. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(1), 66-105.

Deng, R., Feng, S., & Shen, S. (2024). Improving the effectiveness of video-based flipped classrooms with question-embedding. Education and Information Technologies, 29(10), 12677-12702.

Fidan, M. (2023). The effects of microlearning-supported flipped classroom on pre-service teachers’ learning performance, motivation and engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 28(10), 12687-12714.

Firdaus, R. R., Senevi Gunaratne, M., Rahmat, S. R., & Kamsi, N. S. (2019). Does climate change only affect food availability? What else matters?. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 5(1), 1707607.

Gruchmann, T., Timmer, V., Gold, S., & Gessner, C. (2021). Dynamic capabilities for sustainable change in the food processing industry: A multilevel perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 311, 127534.

Handayani, M. N., Ali, M., & Mukhidin, D. W. (2020). Industry perceptions on the need of green skills in agribusiness vocational graduates. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 12(2), 24-33.

Huambachano, M., Arulingam, I., Bowness, E., Korzenszky, A., Mungai, C., Termine, P., & Wittman, H. (2022). Knowledge networks to support youth engagement in sustainable food systems. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, 867344.

Loeb, S., Dynarski, S., McFarland, D., Morris, P., Reardon, S., & Reber, S. (2017). Descriptive Analysis in Education: A Guide for Researchers. NCEE 2017-4023. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

Liu, F., Hai, M., Mei, B., Yi, L., & Xie, S. (2025). How does mechanical damage affect the preservability of postharvest fruits and vegetables?. LWT, 118781.

Mayer, R. E. (2017). Using multimedia for e‐learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 403-423.

Mostrady, A., Sanchez-Lopez, E., & Gonzalez-Sanchez, A. F. (2025). Microlearning and its effectiveness in modern education: A mini review. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 4(1), 33-42.

Myers, S. S., Smith, M. R., Guth, S., Golden, C. D., Vaitla, B., Mueller, N. D., ... & Huybers, P. (2017). Climate change and global food systems: potential impacts on food security and undernutrition. Annual review of public health, 38, 259-277.

Nissen, J. M., Talbot, R. M., Nasim Thompson, A., & Van Dusen, B. (2018). Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’sd for analyzing gains on concept inventories. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 010115.

Rieckmann, M. (2018). Learning to transform the world: Key competencies in Education for Sustainable Development. Issues and trends in education for sustainable development, 39(1), 39-59.

Sawaya, W. N. (2017). Impact of food losses and waste on food security. In Water, energy & food sustainability in the middle east: The sustainability triangle (pp. 361-388). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Serhan, H., & Yannou-Lebris, G. (2021). The engineering of food with sustainable development goals: policies, curriculums, business models, and practices. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 14(1), 12-25.

Tazhbayeva, A., Aimagambetov, Y., Tazhbayev, N., & Grela, M. F. (2023). Impact of Environmental Standards on Employment. Journal of Environmental Management & Tourism, 14(3), 767-777.

Trust, T., & Pektas, E. (2018). Using the ADDIE model and universal design for learning principles to develop an open online course for teacher professional development. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(4), 219-233.

Walsh, M. M., Krusmark, M. A., Jastrembski, T., Hansen, D. A., Honn, K. A., & Gunzelmann, G. (2023). Enhancing learning and retention through the distribution of practice repetitions across multiple sessions. Memory & Cognition, 51(2), 455-472.

Yahia, E. M., & Carrillo-Lopez, A. (Eds.). (2018). Postharvest physiology and biochemistry of fruits and vegetables. Woodhead publishing.

Published

2026-09-03

How to Cite

Handayani, M. N., Najib Tuisina Naenum, & Nadia Trianisawati. (2026). Microlearning Videos for Green Knowledge Development: Feasibility, Learning Changes, and Cross-Case Patterns in Indonesian Vocational Education. Jurnal Kependidikan : Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran, Dan Pembelajaran, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v12i3.22311

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 3 (2026): September (IN PRESS)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

JK use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.