Development of a PRODELIC-Based Instrument for Assessing Students’ Mathematical Literacy and Disposition

Authors

  • Emas Marlina Universitas Bale Bandung, Indonesia
  • Hartono Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Wahyu Setyaningrum Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v12i3.20934

Keywords:

PRODELIC, Literacy Matematis, Dispotition Matematis

Abstract

This study aims to develop and validate a PRODELIC-based instrument for assessing students’ mathematical literacy and mathematical disposition, ensuring that the instrument demonstrates adequate validity and is suitable for evaluating these competencies in mathematics learning. This research method uses Design-Based Research (DBR) which consists of problem analysis, design and innovation development, cyclical repetition and implementation, and reflection evaluation. The research instrument is a validity instrument consisting of a validity assessment sheet for the PRODELIC learning model components and learning support tools. The data analysis used is qualitative and quantitative. The validity of the model, lesson plans, and worksheets was evaluated based on the assessment of experts and practitioners using the Aiken validity index. The results of the study showed that the Aiken's V value for all learning model component instrument items was in the range of 0.85 to 0.95, the lesson plan instrument was in the range of 0.9 to 0.95, and the worksheet was in the range to 1. These scores means that the model is valid and suitable for developing mathematical literacy and disposition. These findings indicate that the PRODELIC model and its supporting instruments are valid and suitable for mathematics learning aimed at developing students’ mathematical literacy and disposition. Theoretically, PRODELIC contributes an integrated framework that combines Deeper Learning and Project-Based Learning, while practically, it provides teachers with a structured approach for designing mathematics instruction that promotes mathematical literacy and disposition.

References

Almerino, P. M., Jr., Etcuban, J. O., De Jose, C. G., & Almerino, J. G. F. (2019). Students’ Affective Belief as the Component in Mathematical Disposition. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5750scholar.google.com.ph+2

Aiken, L. R. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419

Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan validitas (Edisi ke-4). Pustaka Pelajar.

Deal, E. Mooney,E, Cullen,A., Kroesch,A., Bajwa, N.P., orven, J & MacDonald, B. (2024).Accessing and Assessing Componentsof Elementary and Middle School Students’ Mathematical Disposition Through Metaphors, Investigations in Mathematics Learning,https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2024.2419291

Jamiah, Y .(2025) Development of Creative Mathematics Learning Model Based on Mathematical Disposition and Character Value. Journal of Ecohumanism. (4), (1), pp. 4534 – 4545. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i1.6352

Joyce, B. R., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2009). Models of teaching (8th ed.). Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.

Kusmaryono, I., Suyitno, H., Dwijanto, D., & Dwidayati, N. (2019). The Effect of Mathematical Disposition on Mathematical Power Formation: Review of Dispositional Mental Functions. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 343–356.

Leton, S. I., Lakapu, M., Dosinaeng, W. B. N., & Fitriani, N. (2025). Integrating local wisdoms for improving students’ mathematical literacy: The promising context in learning whole numbers. Infinity Journal, 14(2), 369-392. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v14i2.p369-392

Liu, Y., & Wu, D. (2020). Analyze of students’ mathematical disposition and learning

Manfreda Kolar, V., & Hodnik, T. (2021). Mathematical literacy from the perspective of solving contextual problems. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.467

Mavrikis, M., & Dodd, J. (2023). Mathematical Literacy in Educational Practices: Applications and Results. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(2), 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000425

McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. Routledge.

Mubarokah, A. A. L, & Amir, F. A. (2024). Primary Students’ Errors in Solving Mathematical Literacy Problems Based on Newman Analysis. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 18(2), 217-230. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.v18i2.pp217-230

Murphy, D., Imms, W., & Mahat, M. (2025). Deeper learning by design: secondary pupils’ study approaches across innovative and traditional learning spaces. Learning Environments Research, 28(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-025-09546-z

Murtiyasa, B., & Budiningsih, B. (2022). The effectiveness of project based learning in improving students mathematics problem solving ability. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v12.i2.202225

Mthethwa-Kunene, K., Rugube, T., & Maphosa, C. (2022). Rethinking Pedagogy: Interrogating Ways of Promoting Deeper Learning in Higher Education. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 3(1), e02204. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/11439

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2020). Standards for Mathematics Teacher Preparation. Reston, VA: NCTM. https://www.nctm.org/Standards-and-Positions/CAEP-Standards/

Nieveen, N. (2007). Formative evaluation in educational design research. In An introduction to educational design research. SLO.

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881

OECD. (2018). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science and Financial Literacy. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264305274-en

Rahmawati, Y., & Prabowo, A. (2022). The impact of procedural learning models on students' conceptual understanding in mathematics. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.1528a

Reeves, T. C. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational Design Research (pp. 52–66). London: Routledge.

Retnawati, H (2015)” Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen penelitian (Panduan Peneliti, Mahasiswa, dan Psikometrial)”. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.

Supianti, I. I., Yaniawati, P., Bonyah, E., Hasbiah, A. W., & Rozalini, N. (2025). STEAM approach in project-based learning to develop mathematical literacy and students' character. Infinity Journal, 14(2), 283-302. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v14i2.p283-302

Supianti, I. I., Yaniawati, P., Osman, S. Z. M., Al-Tamar, J., & Lestari, N. (2022). Development of teaching materials for e-learning-based statistics materials oriented towards the mathematical literacy ability of vocational high school students. Infinity, 11(2), 237-254. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v11i2.p237-254

Wijaya, T. T., Hidayat, W., Hermita, N., Alim, J. A., & Abdul Talib, C. A. (2024).

Exploring contributing factors to PISA 2022 mathematics achievement: Insights from Indonesian teachers. Infinity, 13(1), 139–156. DOI: 10.22460/infinity.v13i1.p139 156

Published

2026-09-04

How to Cite

Emas Marlina, Hartono, & Wahyu Setyaningrum. (2026). Development of a PRODELIC-Based Instrument for Assessing Students’ Mathematical Literacy and Disposition. Jurnal Kependidikan : Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran, Dan Pembelajaran, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v12i3.20934

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 3 (2026): September (IN PRESS)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

JK use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.