Visualization Animal Tissue: Development of a 3D E-Atlas Based on Problem-Based Learning with a Deep Learning Approach in High School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v12i3.20814Keywords:
animal tissue, deep learning, E-atlas 3D, Problem Based LearningAbstract
This study aims to develop a 3D E-Atlas based on Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and an in-depth learning approach for teaching animal tissue at the senior high school level and to evaluate its validity and practicality. The study employed a Research and Development (R&D) method using the Plomp development model, which encompasses the preliminary investigation and prototyping stages. The research participants consisted of 67 Grade 11 students from two senior high schools in Riau Province, Indonesia. Data were collected through interviews, needs analysis questionnaires, expert validation sheets, and student practicality questionnaires. The development process involved curriculum analysis, instructional analysis, interviews, needs assessment, self-evaluation, expert feasibility testing, one-to-one evaluation, small-group evaluation, learner practicality testing, and documentation. The findings indicated that the developed 3D E-Atlas achieved a very high level of validity, as reflected in an expert validation score of 97%. Furthermore, the practicality test indicated that the media was categorized as very practical, with a score of 85% in the field test. These findings suggest that the integration of interactive 3D visualization with PBL syntax and immersive learning activities may support students’ learning motivation, engagement, and conceptual understanding of animal tissue. The contribution of this study lies in the development of innovative digital learning media for biology education by integrating 3D visualization technology with a student-centered learning approach to support interactive, contextualized, and meaningful 21st-century learning.
References
Anggraini, D., Yustina, Y., Daryanes, F., & Natalina, M. (2023). Influence of Problem-Based Learning and Blended Learning on Students’ Creative Thinking Ability in Class XI SMAN Plus Riau Province Material Body Defense System. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(4), 1916–1921. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i4.1973
Bostyn, D. H., & Roets, A. (2022). Sequential decision-making impacts moral judgment: How iterative dilemmas can expand our perspective on sacrificial harm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 98. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JESP.2021.104244
Cain, A., Tubino, L., & Krishnan, S. (2020). Using Technology to Enable a Shift from Marks to Outcomes-Based Assessment. Enabling Power of Assessment, 7, 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41956-1_16
Chen, G., Lo, C. K., & Hu, L. (2020). Sustaining online academic discussions: Identifying the characteristics of messages that receive responses. Computers and Education, 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103938
Chung, E. Y. H. (2019). Facilitating learning of community-based rehabilitation through problem-based learning in higher education. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1868-4
Dolmans, D. H. J. M. (2019). How theory and design-based research can mature PBL practice and research. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 24(5), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09940-2
Dualom, S. (2021). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (Pbl) Dengan Bantuan Lembar Kerja Siswa Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Pada Materi Sistem Gerak Kelas Xi Ips Sman 3 Rambah. Jurnal Pendidikan Rokania, 6(3), 312. https://e-jurnal.stkiprokania.ac.id/index.php/jpr/article/view/459
El-Saadani, S., & Metwally, S. (2019). Inequality of opportunity linked to disability in school enrollment among youth: Evidence from Egypt. International Journal of Educational Development, 67, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.04.001
Fahmi, A. N., Yusuf, M., & Muchtarom, M. (2021). Integration of Technology in Learning Activities: E-Module on Islamic Religious Education Learning for Vocational High School Students. Journal of Education Technology, 5(2), 282–290. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i2.35313
Fullan, M. (2020). System Change in Education. American Journal of Education, 126(4), 653–663. https://doi.org/10.1086/709975
Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., Chu, F., Scofield, J. E., & Hibbard, D. F. (2019). Sex Differences in Mathematics Anxiety and Attitudes: Concurrent and Longitudinal Relations to Mathematical Competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(8), 1447–1461. https://doi.org/10.1037/EDU0000355
Gomoll, A., Hillenburg, B., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2020). “I Have Never Had A PBL Like This Before”: On Viewing, Re-viewing, and Co-design. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 14(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijpbl.v14i1.28802
Hattie, J. A. C., & Donoghue, G. M. (2016). Learning strategies: a synthesis and conceptual model. NPJ Science of Learning, 1(1), 16013. https://doi.org/10.1038/NPJSCILEARN.2016.13
Hernandez, M. J. (2020). A Comparison of Selected Items Found in Graduation Survey Instruments from MD and DO Schools. What It Reveals About Satisfaction with Career Choice. Medical Science Educator, 30(4), 1413–1418. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40670-020-01045-5
Hughes, J. N., West, S. G., Kim, H., & Bauer, S. S. (2018). Effect of early grade retention on school completion: A prospective study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(7), 974–991. https://doi.org/10.1037/EDU0000243
Imam Suja, M., Rukun, K., Rahmatina Rahim, F., Yulia Sari, S., Dwi Sundari, P., Aulia, F., & Fauza, N. (2022). To cite this article: Fanny Rahmatina Rahim et al 2022. J. Phys, 12075. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2309/1/012075
Kamal, K., Sudiatmika, A. R., Suma, I. K., & Suardana, I. N. (2024). Meta-Analysis: The Influence of the PBL Learning Model on Students’ Critical Thinking Ability in Physics Learning. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 12(2), 168. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v12i2.18086
Krell, M., Redman, C., Mathesius, S., Krüger, D., & van Driel, J. (2020). Assessing Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Scientific Reasoning Competencies. Research in Science Education, 50(6), 2305–2329. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11165-018-9780-1
Law, K. M. Y., Geng, S., & Li, T. (2019). Student enrollment, motivation and learning performance in a blended learning environment: The mediating effects of social, teaching, and cognitive presence. Computers and Education, 136, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.021
Loyens, S. M. M., van Meerten, J. E., Schaap, L., & Wijnia, L. (2023). Situating Higher-Order, Critical, and Critical-Analytic Thinking in Problem- and Project-Based Learning Environments: A Systematic Review. In Educational Psychology Review (Vol. 35, Issue 2). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09757-x
Magdalena, I., Prabandani, R. O., Rini, E. S., Fitriani, M. A., & Putri, A. A. (2020). Analisis Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 2(2), 170–187. https://ejournal.stitpn.ac.id/index.php/nusantara
Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia Learning. Multimedia Learning. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941355
Mills, A. M., Weaver, J. C., Bertelsen, C. D., & Dziak, E. T. (2020). Take Pause in Quiet Moments: Engaging in Reflection to Guide Instruction. The Reading Teacher, 74(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.1915
Mittelmeier, J., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., Hillaire, G., & Whitelock, D. (2018). The influence of internationalised versus local content on online intercultural collaboration in groups: A randomised control trial study in a statistics course. Computers and Education, 118, 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.003
Nirmalawaty, C. M., Rivaldi, A., Siregar, D., Wahyuni, Y., & Susanto, R. (2021). Eduscience : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan ANALISIS KOMPETENSI PEDAGOGIK BERBASIS KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL PADA GURU MI NURUL YAQIN. Jakarta Barat Jl. Arjuna Utara, 6(9).
Nitisiri, K., Jamrus, T., Sethanan, K., Chetchotsak, D., & Nakrachata-Amon, T. (2023). Problem-Based Learning in Marketing Engineer Course: A Case Study from Industrial Engineering Curriculum. Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, 41, 691–700. https://doi.org/10.3233/ATDE230665
Nugraha, I. S., & Suherdi, D. (2021). Scientific Approach: An English Learning-Teaching (ELT) Approach in the 2013 Curriculum. Journal of English and Education, 5(2).
Plomp, Nieveen, N., & Folmer, E. (2013). Educational Design Research Educational Design Research. Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development: SLO, 1–206. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=EJ815766
Pratama, H., Azman, M. N. A., Kassymova, G. K., & Duisenbayeva, S. S. (2020). The Trend in Using Online Meeting Applications for Learning During the Period of Pandemic COVID-19: A Literature Review. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 1(2), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v1i2.15
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2019.103778
Rahmawati, E. (2025). Integrasi Gamifikasi pada Pembelajaran Berbasis Deep Learning di Sekolah Dasar. Tarunateach: Journal of Elementary School, 3(2), 136–146. https://journal.staitaruna.ac.id/index.php/jes/article/view/655
Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu, EUR 28775 EN, Oficina de Publicaciones de la Unión Europea. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Sugiyono. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D.
Sun, C., Shute, V. J., Stewart, A., Yonehiro, J., Duran, N., & Mello, S. D. ’. (2019). Towards a generalized competency model of collaborative problem solving. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103672
Sun, M., Chu, F., & Gao, C. (2022). Application of the combination of three-dimensional visualization with a problem-based learning mode of teaching to spinal surgery teaching. BMC Medical Education, 22(840). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03931-5
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10648-019-09465-5/FIGURES/1
Tibell, L. A. E., & Rundgren, C. J. (2019). Educational challenges of molecular life science: Characteristics and implications for education and research. In Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14636-9_3
Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., & Fazilat Siddiq and Evrim Baran. (2020). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) on JSTOR. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1). https://www.jstor.org/stable/48727440
Voogt, J. M., Pieters, J. M., & Handelzalts, A. (2016). Teacher collaboration in curriculum design teams: effects, mechanisms, and conditions. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(3–4), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2016.1247725
Wang, J., Shu, X., Bach, B., & Hinrichs, U. (2025). Visualization Atlases: Explaining and Exploring Complex Topics Through Data, Visualization, and Narration. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 31(1), 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456311
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with JK agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
-
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
