Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Functional Assertiveness Scale among Indonesian College Students

Authors

  • Nadine Salsabila Anandita Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Fatma Kusuma Mahanani Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Takashi Mitamura Ritsumeikan University, Japan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v12i3.20738

Keywords:

Functional Assertiveness Scale (FAS), Psychometric Properties, Measurement Invariance, Cross-Cultural Adaptation

Abstract

This study aims to adapt and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Indonesian version of the Functional Assertiveness Scale (FAS) (Mitamura, 2018). The scale was translated and culturally adapted following the International Test Commission Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second Edition) (ITC, 2018), involving three translators, six expert reviewers, and 11 lay reviewers. A quantitative approach was employed, and the adapted instrument was administered to 303 Indonesian university students aged 18-23 years selected through convenience sampling. Construct validity was evaluated using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficients, and measurement invariance across gender was examined using Multi-Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MG-CFA). The CFA supported the original 12-item two-factor structure, with satisfactory model fit (TLI = 0.951, CFI = 0.937, SRMR = 0.045, RMSEA = 0.051) after residual covariances were added in single-group CFA. Reliability coefficients were satisfactory for the Objective Effectiveness subscale (α = 0.803), the Pragmatic Politeness subscale (α = 0.713), and the total scale (α = 0.799). Furthermore, MG-CFA demonstrated strict measurement invariance across gender, indicating that the scale functions equivalently for male and female respondents. These findings provide evidence that the Indonesian version of the Functional Assertiveness Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring functional assertiveness and supports its use in future psychological research and assessment in Indonesia.

References

Afriyana, S. Z., Mulyati, & Hamiyati. (2020). Hubungan Asertivitas dan Motivasi dengan Keterampilan Manajemen Waktu dalam Penyusunan Skripsi Mahasiswa. JKKP (Jurnal Kesejahteraan Keluarga Dan Pendidikan), 7(01), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.21009/JKKP.071.07

Alberti, R. E., & Emmons, M. L. (2017). Your perfect right: Assertiveness and equality in your life and relationships (Tenth edition). New Harbinger Publications, Inc.

Anfajaya, M. A., & Indrawati, E. S. (2016). Hubungan antara Konsep Diri dengan Perilaku Asertif pada Mahasiswa Organisatoris Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro Semarang. Jurnal EMPATI, 5(3), 529–532. https://doi.org/10.14710/empati.2016.15396

Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan Validitas (4th ed.). Pustaka Belajar.

Azwar, S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Psikologi (2nd ed.). Pustaka Belajar.

Azwar, S. (2022). Riset Konstruksi Skala Psikologi. Pustaka Belajar.

Bishop, S. (2013). Develop your assertiveness (3rd ed). Kogan Page Ltd.

Chen, F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

Ishii, M., Ozone, S., Masumoto, S., et al. (2026). Validity and reliability evaluation of the Functional Assertiveness Scale for community pharmacists: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-026-00609-8

ITC. (2018). ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second Edition). International Journal of Testing, 18(2), 101–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2017.1398166

Janice, Purwanti, M., & Aisyah, A. R. K. (2023). Differences in Assertive Communication of Young Adults with Four Different Types Of Parenting In Jabodetabek. Manasa, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.25170/manasa.v12i2.4744

Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (Fifth edition). GUILFORD.

Kristanto, A. A., Nor, A., Pattinasarany, K. A. S., & Resma, S. (2022). Peran Asertivitas dan Empati Sebagai Prediktor untuk Memprediksi Perilaku Prososial. Psikoborneo: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 10(1), 140. https://doi.org/10.30872/psikoborneo.v10i1.7374

Mitamura, T. (2018). Developing the Functional Assertiveness Scale: Measuring Dimensions of Objective Effectiveness and Pragmatic Politeness. Japanese Psychological Research, 60(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12185

Parray, W. M., & Kumar, S. (2016). Assertiveness among Undergraduate Students of the University. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 4(8), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.25215/0476.021

Perceka, M. Z., Fahmi, I., & Kurniadewi, E. (2019). Identitas Etnik dan Asertivitas Mahasiswa Suku Sunda. Jurnal Psikologi Islam Dan Budaya, 2(2), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpib.v2i2.5641

Widaningrum, M. M. V. (2015). Perbedaan perilaku asertif ditinjau dari tingkat Pendidikan, usia, dan jenis kelamin pada siswa SMA Negeri 3 Salatiga dan mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi UKSW Salatiga [Doctoral Dissertation, Program Studi Psikologi FPSI-UKSW]. http://repository.uksw.edu/handle/123456789/9478

Wigunawati, E. (2019). Faktor yang Memengaruhi Asertivitas Perempuan di Kabupaten Nias. Jurnal Inada: Kajian Perempuan Indonesia Di Daerah Tertinggal, Terdepan, Dan Terluar, 1(2), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.33541/ji.v1i2.936

Zakiya, N., & Hariyadi, S. (2022). Nilai Budaya Kolektivisme dan Perilaku Asertif pada Suku Jawa. Journal of Social and Industrial Psychology, 11(2), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.15294/sip.v11i2.64788

Published

2026-09-03

How to Cite

Nadine Salsabila Anandita, Fatma Kusuma Mahanani, & Takashi Mitamura. (2026). Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Functional Assertiveness Scale among Indonesian College Students. Jurnal Kependidikan : Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran, Dan Pembelajaran, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v12i3.20738

Citation Check