Using the CIPP Model to Analyse Structural Policies and Students’ Social Awareness Through Social Studies Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jtp.v11i3.21451Keywords:
CIPP Evaluation, structural policy, social studies learning, social awareness, education policyAbstract
This study aims to analyse the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) model in explaining the relationship between social, economic and cultural structural policies and the development of pupils’ social awareness through Social Studies (IPS) learning. Unlike previous studies, which generally evaluated Social Studies learning or the implementation of the CIPP model in isolation, this study positions regional structural policies as the primary context, analysed in an integrated manner alongside the inputs, processes and products of learning to explain the formation of students’ social awareness. This study employs a qualitative approach using a descriptive-analytical method, conducted at SMAN 2 Bandar Lampung. Data collection techniques included observation, in-depth interviews and documentation, supported by quantitative data analysis using a Likert scale. The research findings indicate that regional structural policies, as reflected in the Bandar Lampung City Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMD), serve as the context that shapes pupils’ social conditions. The heterogeneous social structure of schools acts as an input that influences pupils’ learning experiences. The social studies learning process acts as the primary mediator in linking these policies to the development of pupils’ social awareness. Meanwhile, students’ social awareness, as an outcome, falls into the high category, reflecting critical thinking skills, social empathy and active participation. The main findings of this study indicate that structural policies do not directly influence students’ social awareness, but are mediated by contextual and reflective social studies learning. This study makes a theoretical contribution to the development of a public policy-based social studies learning model through the CIPP approach.
References
Adha, M. M. (2019). Pendidikan IPS berbasis nilai dan karakter. Bandar Lampung: FKIP Universitas Lampung.
Adha, M. M., & Susanto, E. (2020). Kekuatan nilai-nilai Pancasila dalam membangun kepribadian masyarakat Indonesia. Al-Adabiya: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Keagamaan, 15(1), 121–138.
Banks, J. A. (2022). Teaching strategies for the social studies. Pearson Education.
Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309. design. Harvard University Press.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Macmillan.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.
Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). Continuum.
Giroux, H. A. (2011). On critical pedagogy. Continuum.
Jasrio, A., Ambiyar, Rizal, F., Safitri, E., & Nofrion. (2026). Implementation of CIPP model in social studies learning: A literature review. International Journal of Geography, Social, and Multicultural Education, 4(1), 56–77.
Dika, S. L., & Singh, K. (2002). Applications of social capital in educational literature: A critical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 72(1), 31–60. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072001031
Ream, R. K., & Palardy, G. J. (2008). Reexamining social class differences in the availability and educational utility of parental social capital. American Educational Research Journal, 45(2), 238–273. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308643
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Miswar, D., Alawi, A. R., Nugraheni, I. L., Yarmaidi, & Aryati, F. (2022). Spatial sustainable agriculture analysis of social economy of sustainable agriculture in North Pringsewu Regency. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 5(5), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v5i5.244
Miswar, D., Salsabilla, A., Yarmaidi, Susanti, E., & Aryati, F. (2021). Study of sustainable food agricultural land (LP2B) using spatial approach South Pringsewu District. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(12), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i12.3176
Miswar, D., Sugiyanta, I. G., & Yarmaidi. (2020). Kajian geografis potensi wilayah berbasis geospasial Kabupaten Pringsewu. LaGeografia, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.35580/lageografia.v18i3.13609
Muda, I., Adha, M. M., Miswar, D., & Sinaga, R. M. (2025). Social studies-based education policy analysis model to overcome inequality in access and education in Bandar Lampung. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, 53(2), 336–348
OECD. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.
Pada, D., Rusli, M., & Jumadi. (2025). Critical Pedagogy in Social Studies Education: Empowering Students Through Democratic Dialogue. Journal La Edusci, 6(6), 1285–1296.
Parsons, W. (2005). Public policy: An introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Pemerintah Kota Bandar Lampung. (2021). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah (RPJMD) Kota Bandar Lampung Tahun 2021–2026. Pemerintah Kota Bandar Lampung.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
Riawan, I. M. O., Citariani, N. M., & Lokasanti, I. K. (2025). Efektivitas Model Evaluasi CIPP dalam Program Pendidikan: Kajian Literatur Sistematis. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16(2), 108–115.
Sinaga, R. M., Maydiantoro, A., Ochayi, O. A., Yulianti, D., Arif, S., Basri, M., Bolado, J. R. T., & Suroto. (2022). Reasoning model and moral simulation to improve students' social skills: A focused look at emotional intelligence. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 12(1), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2022-0026
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. Jossey-Bass.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. Guilford Press
UNESCO. (2023). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing.
Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237–269. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041002237
Wulan, M. P., Listyasari, W. D., Santosa, H., & Huda, S. A. (2026). A Systematic Literature Review on the CIPP Evaluation Model in Education: Examining Its Trends, Applications, and Research Gaps. Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(3), 307–320.
Youniss, J., & Yates, M. (1997). Community service and social responsibility in youth. University of Chicago Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Iskandar, Muhammad Mona Adha, Dedy Miswar, Risma Margaretha Sinaga, Irma Lusi Nugraheni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Publishing Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and publishing agreement.
Copyright
- Authors who publish with JTP agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Licensing for Data Publication
Licensing for Data Publication
JTP use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
.png){kind=logo}
