DIVERSITY OF LEARNING: THE BASIS FOR FURTHER INSTRUCTION IN TEACHING MODALITY

Muliani Muliani, Heri Hidayatullah

Abstract


This research deals with the diversity of learning as part the development of Interstate New Teachers Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC Standards) teaching model in teaching Modality. Regarding the use of modalities in English as foreign language for students in Indonesia,it cannot be denied that to most of the students particularly where this research is being carried out,  the students awareness of the of modalality limits up to the use of those modal verbs in text ignoring the context. In other words, the ignorance of cultural use occurs in which in contrast, language use must take tense and aspect into consideration. By that reason, the need of teaching modalities further is the main concern as the aim of this research. 80 students of the English Department of IKIP Mataram were involved as the subject of the research where formative assessment were found by applying “learning style” topic. It was implemented b means of preparing the questionnaire consisting of 1-10 with three-color-box (a,b,c) in which the students were asked to color the box with question mark inside where eventually it was found that the students’ diversity can be seen from their hobbies which they use as their learning styles. Most of students love to do sport exercise, watch movie, listening to the music, travelling, reading novel, and singing. Besides, it is also found that students are different in their learning style where some students prefer to learn by discussing, in peer, move around, learn in quite, or even to some of them, any situation things that can distract theirconcentration. In short, it can be concluded that the students are categorized as visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learners. 


Keywords


Diversity of Learning, Modality, InTASC Standards

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bonyadi, Alireza. (2011). Linguistic Manifestations of Modality in Newspaper Editorials. International Journal of Linguistics. ISSN 1948-5425 2011, Vol. 3, No. 1: E30.

CCSSO Team. (2011). A Resource for Ongoing Teachers Development. INTASC Model Core Teaching Standards and Learning Progression for Teachers. Retrieved April from http://.ccsso.org/.../2011/intasc_model_core_teaching_standards_2011.pdf.

Damrongpanit, Suntonrapot., Reungtragul, Auyporn. (2013). Matching of learning styles and teaching styles: Advantage and disadvantage on ninth-grade students’ academic achievements. Academic Journals. Vol. 8(20), pp. 1937-1947. DOI: 10.5897/ERR2013.1583.

Fasold, W. R., & J. Connor-Linton. (2006). An Introduction to Language and Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hawkar, Akram, Awla. (2014). Learning Styles and Their Relation to Teaching Styles. International Journal of Language and Linguistics.Vol. 2, No. 3, 2014, pp. 241-245. doi:10.11648/j.ijll.20140203.23.

Henson, Ken. ( 2009). Making the most of INTASC Standards. SRATE Journal.18 (2) , 34-40.

Kabadayi A. (2007). Analyzing the cognitive teaching styles of preservice and cooperating preschool teachers in Turkey. Early Child Development and Care. 177(3):275-293.

Kassaian, Z. (2007). Learning Styles and Lexical Presentation Modes. Estudios de linguistic.

Krashen, D, Stephen., Andersen, S, Elaine., Scarcela, C, Robin. (1990). Developing Communicative Competence in A Second Language. Series on Issues in Second Language Research.USA: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.

Okur M, Bahar HH. (2010). Learning styles of primary education prospective Mathematics teachers; states of trait-anxiety and academic success. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2:3632-3637.

Swan, M. (2005). What is grammar? In Beaven, B (ed.), (2005). IATEFL. Cardiff Conference Selections: 60-61.

R. Angus., & L. C. de Oliveira. (2012). Diversity in secondary English classrooms: Conceptions and enactments. Retrieved from: http://education.waikato.ac.nz/research/files/etpc/files/2012v11n4art1.pdf

Riazi, A., & Riasati, M. J. (2007). Language learning style preference: A students’ case studyof Shiraz EFL Institutes. Asian EFL Journal, 9(1), 6.

Gilakjani, Pourhossein, Abbas. (2012). Visual, Auditory, Kinaesthetic Learning Styles and Their Impacts on English Language Teaching. Journal of Studies in Education. Vol. 2, No. 1, (104-113). doi:10.5296/jse.v2i1.1007.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v4i2.2448

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Muliani Muliani, Heri Hidayatullah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP is abstracted/indexed in the following databases:

                    


Published by Faculty of Culture, Management, and Business
Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika
p-ISSN: 2355-0309 | e-ISSN : 2548-5865
email: [email protected]

 Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.