Guided-Inquiry E-Module for Critical Thinking in Reaction-Rate Learning

Authors

  • Rini Rianti Chemistry Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Mataram
  • Muntari University of Mataram
  • Sunniarti Ariani Chemistry Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v14i4.22218

Keywords:

e-Module, Guided Inquiry, Critical Thinking, Reaction Rate

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a guided-inquiry e-module for reaction-rate learning and determine its validity, practicality, and initial effectiveness in fostering critical-thinking skills. The 4D research-and-development model was employed, followed by a limited one-group pretest–posttest trial involving 19 eleventh-grade science students at SMAN 1 Labuapi. The product, response questionnaires, and four-item essay test were reviewed by two chemistry-education lecturers and one chemistry teacher. The novelty of the product lies in the explicit alignment of each guided-inquiry stage with the critical-thinking indicators of interpretation, analysis, evaluation, and inference. Validity was analyzed using Aiken’s V, inter-rater reliability using Percentage of Agreement, practicality using response percentages, and learning improvement using normalized gain. The e-module achieved a mean Aiken’s V of 0.89 and 89% reliability. The teacher and student questionnaires achieved Aiken’s V values of 0.93 and 0.89 and reliability values of 94% and 89%, respectively; the critical-thinking test achieved an Aiken’s V of 0.93 and 92% reliability. Practicality was rated at 91% by the teacher and 85% by students. The mean N-Gain of 0.59 indicated a moderate improvement. Therefore, the e-module was highly valid, highly practical, and demonstrated initial effectiveness in the limited trial.

References

Amalya, R. C., & Lutfi, A. (2024). E-modul berbasis mobile learning untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis pada materi kesetimbangan kimia. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(10), 12244–12257. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v7i10.6118

Aminah, Muntari, Wildan, & Loka, I. N. (2024). The development of contextual-based chemical e-modules on buffer solution materials on online learning for class XI SMA students. Chemistry Education Practice, 7(1), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.29303/cep.v7i1.3516

Antara, A. A. P. (2020). Penyetaraan vertikal dengan pendekatan klasik dan item response theory: Teori dan aplikasi. Deepublish.

Ardiansyah, A. R. (2020). Uji kelayakan pengembangan buku ajar tematik berbasis inkuiri kontekstual untuk siswa sekolah dasar. DIDAKTIKA: Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 3(2), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.21831/didaktika.v3i2.36165

Baehaqi, M. L., & Andriyani, D. (2023). Pembelajaran berdiferensiasi dalam perspektif konstruktivisme pada mata pelajaran PPKn di SMP Negeri 1 Paguyangan. Jurnal Kridatama Sains dan Teknologi, 5(2), 348–363. https://doi.org/10.53863/kst.v5i02.943

Cheva, V. K., & Zainul, R. (2019). Pengembangan e-modul berbasis inkuiri terbimbing pada materi sifat keperiodikan unsur untuk SMA/MA kelas X. EduKimia, 1(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.24036/ekj.v1i1.104077

Dahlia. (2021). Inkuiri terbimbing dan critical thinking. Tata Akbar.

Damayanti, I., Rokhmat, J., & Muntari. (2026). Validity of a problem-based learning science e-module integrated with ethnophysics to support science process skills and critical thinking abilities. KONSTAN—Jurnal Fisika dan Pendidikan Fisika, 11(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.20414/konstan.v11i01.940

Dewi, I. A. K. P., Siahaan, J., & Muntari. (2025). The effect of the CINQASE learning model on critical thinking abilities and understanding of acid-base titration concepts. Chemistry Education Practice, 8(1), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.29303/cep.v8i1.8743

Djarwo, C. F., Inggamer, M. M., Jukwati, Rumbrapuk, A. J., & Astuti, N. (2025). Analisis literasi digital berbasis etnosains dalam pembelajaran kimia untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan motivasi belajar mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran IPA Indonesia, 15(1), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppii.v15i1.93346

Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.

Febriana, F. D., & Sakti, N. C. (2021). Pengembangan e-modul berbasis kontekstual sebagai pendukung pembelajaran jarak jauh kelas X IPS. Jurnal PROFIT: Kajian Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Ilmu Ekonomi, 8(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.36706/jp.v8i1.14057

Firjatillah, M., Junaidi, E., & Hakim, A. (2020). Pengembangan petunjuk praktikum kimia bahan alam: Ekstraksi senyawa kardol dari kulit biji jambu mete. Chemistry Education Practice, 3(2), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.29303/cep.v3i2.2014

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Hanisah, Irhasyuarna, Y., & Yulinda, R. (2022). Pengembangan media pembelajaran interaktif menggunakan iSpring Suite 10 pada materi reproduksi tumbuhan untuk mengukur hasil belajar. JUPEIS: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial, 1(3), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.55784/jupeis.Vol1.Iss3.68

Irawan, E. (2021). Deteksi miskonsepsi di era pandemi. Zahir Press.

Ivansyah, M., Rahmatullah, A., Rosid, A., Yogawati, V. E., Rozikin, D. A., & Aisyah, N. (2025). Resonansi student-centered learning terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa MPAI UNUJA. ALMUSTOFA: Journal of Islamic Studies and Research, 2(2), 723–731.

Laili, I., Ganefri, & Usmeldi. (2019). Efektivitas pengembangan e-modul project based learning pada mata pelajaran instalasi motor listrik. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 3(3), 306–315. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v3i3.21840

Liani, B. M. R., Ayub, S., Wahyudi, W., & Makhrus, M. (2022). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran fisika berbasis pendekatan konflik kognitif untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah peserta didik. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Fisika Indonesia, 3(2), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppfi.v3i2.122

Muliaman, A., & Mellyzar. (2020). Peningkatan hasil belajar menggunakan model project based learning pada materi laju reaksi. Chemistry in Education, 9(2), 91–95.

Muliati, E., Al Idrus, S. W., & Muntari, M. (2024). Pengembangan modul praktikum kimia berbasis proyek pada materi larutan penyangga. Chemistry Education Practice, 7(2), 376–381. https://doi.org/10.29303/cep.v7i2.6504

Muntari, Listantia, N., & Pertiwi, G. (2025). Pengaruh model problem based learning berbasis green chemistry terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan pemahaman konsep materi hidrolisis garam pada siswa kelas XI SMAN 1 Lingsar. Journal of Authentic Research, 4(2), 2679–2690. https://doi.org/10.36312/q4sqxs70

Nurdyansyah, & Fahyuni, E. F. (2016). Inovasi model pembelajaran sesuai Kurikulum 2013. Nizamia Learning Center.

Pikoli, M., Sukertini, K., & Isa, I. (2022). Analisis model mental siswa dalam mentransformasikan konsep laju reaksi melalui multipel representasi. Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry, 4(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.34312/jjec.v4i1.13515

Putri, S. R., & Sukarmin. (2023). Pengembangan e-modul berbasis inkuiri terbimbing untuk melatihkan keterampilan berpikir kritis peserta didik pada materi laju reaksi. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 7(2), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.7.2.327-335

Putri, W. P., Muntari, & Savalas, L. R. T. (2026). Practicality of local wisdom-based science e-modules using problem-based learning for critical thinking and digital literacy. Indonesian Journal of Educational Innovation, 2(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.65622/ijei.v2i1.241

Sari, F. F. K., & Atmojo, I. R. W. (2021). Analisis kebutuhan bahan ajar digital berbasis flipbook untuk memberdayakan keterampilan abad 21 peserta didik pada pembelajaran IPA sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(6), 6079–6085. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i6.1715

Subro, M. H., & Fawaid, A. (2025). Penerapan pembelajaran abad 21 dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(6), 6344–6348. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v8i6.8243

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children. Indiana University.

Triandini, W., Kosim, K., & Gunada, I. W. (2021). Pengembangan modul fisika berbasis guided inquiry untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik. ORBITA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Fisika, 7(1), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.31764/orbita.v7i1.3953

Wibowo, S. R., Sugiarto, Y. A., & Arif, A. (2025). Optimalisasi flipbook sebagai media inovatif dalam pengembangan bahan ajar elemen akuntansi lembaga fase F kelas XI. Ainara Journal (Jurnal Penelitian dan PKM Bidang Ilmu Pendidikan), 6(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.54371/ainj.v6i1.739

Widyawati, F., & Ardhana, I. A. (2023). Pengembangan e-modul berbasis guided inquiry pada materi sifat koligatif larutan untuk siswa kelas XII SMA/MA. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Kimia, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.36706/jppk.v10i1.19932

Wijayadi, A. W., & Putra, E. B. N. (2019). Pengembangan e-modul struktur atom untuk mendukung perkuliahan kimia dasar berbasis blended learning. Jurnal Zarah, 7(2), 57–61. https://doi.org/10.31629/zarah.v7i2.1455

Yunus, A., Danial, M., & Muharram, M. (2022). Pengembangan e-modul berbasis inkuiri terbimbing untuk meningkatkan kemandirian belajar dan hasil belajar peserta didik pada materi koloid. Chemistry Education Review, 5(2), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.26858/cer.v5i2.32728

Published

2026-09-12

How to Cite

Rianti, R., Muntari, & Ariani, S. (2026). Guided-Inquiry E-Module for Critical Thinking in Reaction-Rate Learning. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v14i4.22218