Description of the Ability to Arrange Assessments According Curriculum 2013 on Chemistry PPG SM3T Student

Sri Rahayu, Hairida Hairida, Rahmat Rasmawan, Rody Putra Sartika, Lukman Hadi

Abstract


The curriculum 2013 experienced a shift in the assessment process, which is from the assessment of results to the assessment process. In the process of carrying out the assessment, many complaints that arise in the field including the difficulty in determining the assessment of various aspects both cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. Researchers are interested in knowing how the ability of PPG SM3T Chemistry Education’s Students as a prospective professional teacher in compiling an assessment based on curriculum 2013. The research purposes were to describe the ability of PPG SM3T Chemistry Education’s Students in compiling an assessment based on curriculum 2013. The methode of the research was descriptive with study case involved 16 students of PPG SM3T Chemistry Education in the 2018/2019 school year. The research instrument was in the form of an assessment rubric with 10 aspects of assessment, one of which contained HOTS questions. The results of the data analysis showed that the ability of PPG SM3T Chemistry Education in compiling HOTS questions was classified as less skilled with an average score 67.19% whereas when viewed from all aspects of the preparation of the assessment based on curriculum 2013 it was classified as skilled with an average score 84.89%.


Keywords


compiling an assesment student of PPG SM3T; chemistry education; curriculum 2013

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, K. N. & Friedman, B. D. (2010). Affective learning: A taxonomy for teaching social work values. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 7(2).

Farida, I. (2017). Evaluasi Pembelajaran berdasarkan Kurikulum Nasional. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Fithri Nuru Ayuni. 2014. Pemahaman Guru terhadap Pendekatan Saintifik (Scientific Approach) dalam Pembelajaran Geografi. Tesis Mahasiswa Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Bandung.

Hairida. (2017). Keterampilan Calon Guru Kimia dalam Mengembangkan Alternative Assessment. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, XXII(1).

Hasriani, A. (2015). Kontribusi Motivasi, Penguasaan Informasi dan Persepsi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia terhadap Kesiapan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 1(2).

Istiqomah, F. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Menyusun Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP) berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013 pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia FKIP Universitas Tanjungpura. Jurnal Universitas Tanjungpura.

Kemendikbud. (2016). Lampiran Permendikbud Nomor 2 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan kebudayaan RI.

Kemendikbud. (2017). Panduan Penilaian oleh Pendidik dan Satuan Pendidikan Sekolah Menengah Atas. (Ebook).

Kunanti, E. S. (2020). Penyusunan Pengembangan Penilaian Berbasis HOTS. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional PBSII (Issue 1). http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/41215/1/Fulltext.pdf

Kurniasih, I dan Sani, B. (2016). Revisi Kurikulum 2013 Implimentasi Konsep dan Penerapan. Jakarta: Kata Pena.

Mahdiansyah. (2018). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Sistem Penilaian Hasil Belajar Siswa (Studi Kasus di Enam Kota). Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan, 11(2): 48-63.

Melati, E Rahma. 2016. Kendala Guru Sekolah Dasar dalam Memahami Kurikulum 2013. Indonesian Jurnal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies, 4 (1): 1-9.

Mosher, J, dkk. (2011). Validity and Test Development. Boston: Pearson Education.

Mulyasa, E. (2013). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Pemikiran Kurikulum. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyasa, E. (2016). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nurwardani, P, etc. (2018). Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi Di Era Industri 4.0. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan Kementrian Riset Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi.

Purwanto, M. Ngalim. (2010). Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Puskurbuk, Balitbang Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2015). Penelitian tentang Penilaian Guru atas Hasil Belajar Siswa Pendidikan Menengah.

Puspendik, Balitbang, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2014). Studi Implementasi Penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013.

Retnawati, H. (2015). Hambatan Guru Matematika Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Menerapkan Kurikulum Baru. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, XXXIV(3).

Retnawati, Heri., Hadi, Samsul., Nugraha A Chandra. 2016. Vocational Highschool Teachers‟ Difficulties in Implementing Assessmen Curriculum 2013 in Yogyakarta Province of Indonesia. International Jurnal of Instruction, 12 (1): 33-48.

Ruslan, Fauziah, T., & Alawiyah, T. (2016). Kendala Guru dalam Menerapkan Penilaian Autentik di SD Kabupaten Pidie. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 1(1), 147–157.

Rusman (2014). Model-Model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Depok: Rajagrafindo Persada.

Setiadi, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan Penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7173

Spang, E. J. (2008). How does teacher education make a difference in our schools? Begining science teachers' and their students' understanding and use of scientific inquiry. UMI 3332930 Disertation Publisher ProQuest.

Subagia, I. W., & Wiratma, I. G. L. (2016). Profil Penilaian Hasil Belajar Siswa Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 5(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v5i1.8293

Sugiyono. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.

Sunarti & Rahmawati, S. (2014). Penilaian dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Supardi. (2015). Penilaian Autentik Pembelajaran Afektif, Kognitif, dan Psikomotor (Konsep dan Aplikasi). Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Supratiknya, A. (2012). Penilaian hasil belajar dengan teknik nontes. Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma.

Uno, H. B & Koni, S. (2016). Assessment Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v12i1.10442

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.