Remote Learning in the Crisis of Covid-19: Motivating or Demotivating the EFL Students to Learn?

Dedi Sumarsono, Taufik Suadiyatno, Abdul Kadir Bagis

Abstract


The implementation of virtual learning in the time of covid-19 pandemic had potentially affected the students’ learning motivation. This research was aimed at finding out; (1) the level of the EFL learning motivation when the remote learning is implemented during the Covid-19; (2) How was the EFL learning motivation when the remote learning implemented during the Covid-19. This study was conducted at two different universities majoring English department and medical laboratory technology department consisting of 202 students. To gain the data, a questionnaire on learning motivation was delivered to the students. The data was analyzed using the Likert scale of agreement or disagreement to interpret the types of learning English motivation. In analyzing the data, both quantitative and qualitative were used as a mixed-methods was applied. The findings of the study showed that the students' motivation was categorized into high level or slightly close to medium level of motivation. Other interesting findings were that the distance learning was claimed less effective because the materials were claimed tent to be difficult, error internet connection, less interaction between students and teachers, and so forth. On the other hand, some students argued that digital learning improves their ability in utilizing the technology media, encourages, encouraged them to be independency and curiosity, and trained the students to be more confident.


Keywords


Remote Learning; Learning Motivation; Motivated or Demotivated; Covid-19 Pandemic

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adedoyin, O., & Soykan, E. (2020): Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities, Interactive Learning Environments, DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180.

Anderson, M., & Kumar, M. (2019). Digital divide persists even as lower-income Americans make gains in tech adoption. FactTank News in the Numbers. Pew Research. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/05/07/digital-divide-persists-even-as-lowerincome-americans-make-gains-in-tech-adoption.

Ayebi-Arthur, K. (2017). E-learning, resilience, and change in higher education: Helping a university cope after a natural disaster. E-Learning and Digital Media, 14(5), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753017751712.

Bali, S., & Liu, M. (2018). Students perceptions toward online learning and face-to-face learning courses. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012094/meta.

Borup, J., Chambers, C., & Stimson, R. (2019). K-12 student perceptions of online teacher and on-site facilitator support in supplemental online courses. Online Learning, 23(4), 253280. doi:10.24059/olj.v23i4.1565.

Demirbilek, M. (2014). The ‘digital natives’ Debate: An Investigation of the digital Propensities of University students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(2), https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1021a.

Dhawan, S. (2020). Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1) 5–22.

Favale, T., Soro, F., Trevisan, M., Drago, I., & Mellia, M. (2020). Campus Traffic and e-Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic. Computer Networks, 176, 107290.

Fishbane, L., & Tomer, A. (2020, March 20). As classes move online during COVID-19, what are disconnected students to do? Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2020/03/20/as-classes-move-online-during-covid-19-whatare-disconnected-students-to-do/.

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educase. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teachingand-online-learning.

Horspool, A., & Yang, S. (2010). A Comparison of University Student Perceptions and Success Learning Music Online and Face-to-face. Music and Worship Faculty Publications. 7.

Keller, J. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. New York, NY: Springer.

Kurt, P., & Kecik, I. (2017). The effect of ARCS motivational model on student motivation to learn English. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 2(1), 22-44. doi:10.4304/jltr.2.1.68-72.

Li, G. (2020). Principles for developing learner agency in language learning in a new eduscape with Covid-19. Langugae Learning, 5, 30-40. https://search.proquest.com/docview/2309856041.

Lin, C., Zheng, B., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Interactions and learning outcomes in online language courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 730–748.

https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12457.

Means, B., & Neisler, J. (2021). Teaching and learning in the time of COVID: The student perspective. Online Learning, 25(1), 8-27. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2496.

Omotayo, F., & Haliru, A. (2020). Perception of task-technology fit of digital library among undergraduates in selected universities in Nigeria. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(1), 102097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019. 102097.

Platt, C., Raile, A., & Yu, N. (2014). Virtually the same? Student perceptions of the equivalence of online classes to face-to-face classes. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 10(3), 489-503.

Quintana, C., Zhang, M., & Krajcik, J. (2005). Scaffolded software environments for supporting metacognitive aspects of online inquiry. Educational Psychologist, 40, 235-244.

Schwartzman, R. (2007). Refining the question: How can online instruction maximize opportunities for all students? Communication Education, 56, 113–117. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/03634520601009728.

Singh, V., Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988-2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289–306.

Tull, S., Dabner, N., & Ayebi-Arthur, K. (2017). Social media and e-learning in response to seismic events: Resilient practices. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 21(1), 63–76.

Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. (2014). Performance gaps between online and face-to-face courses: Differences across types of students and academic subject areas. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(5), 633–659. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2014.0028.

Zhang, J. (2015). Improving English listening proficiency: The application of ARCS learning-motivational model. English Language Teaching, 8(10), 1-6. doi:10.5539/elt.v8n10p1.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v9i1.5257

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Dedi Sumarsono, Taufik Suadiyatno, Abdul Kadir Bagis

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP is abstracted/indexed in the following databases:

                    


Published by Faculty of Culture, Management, and Business
Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika
p-ISSN: 2355-0309 | e-ISSN : 2548-5865
email: [email protected]

 Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.