Project-Based Learning for Mechanical Engineering Students in the Emergency Remote Teaching

Dewanti Ratna Pertiwi, Maria Asumpta Deny Kusumaningrum


Covid-19 has changed a lot of life sectors, including education. The government’s policy to carry out emergency remote teaching (ERT) immediately switches the teachers’ and lecturers’ plans on successful classroom activities. One of the classroom’s activities is project-based learning (PBL). With several limitations, challenges should be taken on so that designing simple but meaningful projects can facilitate project-based learning. Thus, some adaptations should be made since some students are economically impacted. Online learning modes, either synchronous or asynchronous were held to communicate the project. A descriptive qualitative research method was employed by involving two classes of mechanical engineering students. Data were collected from learning platforms observations, interviews with students’ representatives, and questionnaires administered to all students. The project was conducted in four stages; beginning the infographic project, developing the project, closing the project, and evaluating the project. The research indicated that the students completed and engaged in the project successfully through some problems that came up, mainly when the students had to have group work and communicate using internet media since most students were back home with various internet connection access. However, some assessable applications were employed so that the project was well accomplished. In conclusion, conducting a PBL in emergency remote teaching was successfully conducted with some simple available and accessable applications since the students’ conditions varied significantly.


Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT); Infographic; Mechanical Engineering; Project-Based Learning (PBL)

Full Text:



Adipat, S. (2021). Developing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) through Technology-Enhanced Content and Language-Integrated Learning (T-CLIL) Instruction. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6461–6477.

Andersen, A. S., & Kjeldsen,T. H. (2015). Theoretical Foundations of PPL at Roskilde University. In A. S., Andersen & S. B., Heilesen (Eds), The Roskilde Model: Problem-Oriented Learning and Project Work (pp. 3-16). London, New York: Springer.

Arslan, A. (2020). Reliability and Validity of TPACK Instruments in EFL. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(3), 343–360.

Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing Courses in English for Specific Purposes. Palgrave Macmillan, 1(1).

Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to Corona Virus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15, pp. 1-6.

Bugueño, W. M. R. (2013). Using TPACK to promote effective language teaching in an ESL / EFL classroom. Graduate Reseach Paper, 150.

Charles, M. (2013). English for academic purposes. In B. Paltridge, & S. Starfield (Eds.), The Handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 137-153). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Intercultural Education (3rd ed.), 20(2). Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

Dewantari, F., Utami, I. G. A. L. P., & Santosa, M. H. (2021). Infographics and independent learning for English learning in the secondary level context. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 11(2), 250–274.

Dhamayanti, F. I. (2021). EFL Students’ Perception and Motivation Toward Quizizz as E-Learning Media in English E-Classroom. Education of English as Foreign Language, 4(2), 71–78.

Dikti, D. (2020). Buku Panduan Merdeka Belajar - Kampus Merdeka.

Ferri, F., (2020). Online Learning and Emergency Remote Teaching: Opportunities and Challenges in Emergency Situations. Societies, 10(4), 1-18. doi:10.3390/soc10040086.

Gover, G. B., (2017). Teacher thoughts on infographics as alternative assessment: a post-secondary educational exploration. Online Theses and Dissertations. Retrieved from

Heyworth, F. (2002). A Guide to Project Management. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages.

Hsu, Y. S. (2015). The TPACK-P framework for science teachers in a practical teaching context. In Y. S. Hsu (Ed.), Development Of Science Teachers’ TPACK: East Asian Practices (pp. 17–32). Springer.

Hyland, K. (2016). General and specific EAP. In K. Hyland, & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English For Academic Purposes (pp. 17-29). London, New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Lewis. (2014). Infographic Rubric.

Mendikbud. (2020a). Surat Edaran Mendikbud: Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Pendidikan dalam Masa Darurat Penyebaran Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19). Retrieved from

Mohamed, A. A. A. E. F. (2020). Awebsite based on Infographic for Developing Students’ Reading Comprehension of Economic Issues. International Journal of Engineering Research And, V9(02), 434–442.

Nugroho, A., (2021). Emergency Remote Teaching Amidst Global Pandemic: Voices of Indonesian EFL Teachers. Voices of English language Education Society, 5(1), 66-80.

Pedrero, A. L. (2020). Speaking Skill “Holistic Rubric”

Pertiwi, D. R. (2019). HOTS based project in mechanical engineering department. Journal of English Language and Education, 5(1), pp. 44-59.

Potter, A., & Louati, K. (2016). Learning English through project-based learning: The case of engineering education. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, 10-13-Apri(April), 301–303.

Rachmat, N. A., & Arfiandhani, P. (2019). “I Use Multiple-Choice Question in Most Assessment I Prepared”: Efl Teachers’ Voice on Summative Assessment. ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal), 5(1), 163–179.

Rahimi, M., & Pourshahbaz, S. (2019). English as a foreign language teachers’ TPACK: Emerging research and opportunities. Hersey, PA: IGI Global.

Sabila, N. F., Pahlevi, M. R., & Miftakh, F. (2020). Incorporating Edmodo As Learning Management System of Summative Assessment in Efl Classroom. Journal on English Language Teaching, 8(2), 132–145.

Santhi, D. D. Y. et al. (2019). ICT and project-based learning in a rural school: an EFL context. Third International Conference on Sustainable Innovation 2019 – Humanity, Education and Social Sciences (IcoSIHESS 2019), 353, pp. 29-35.

Stanley, G. (2019). Introduction to remote language teaching. In Stanley, G. (Ed), Innovations in education Remote teaching (pp. 8-12). London: British Council.

Tan, J. C. L., & Chapman, A. (2016). Project-Based Learning for Academically-Able Students. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Wiranegara, D. A. (2019). Designing Project-Based Learning in ESP Class. Journal of English for Academic and Specific Purposes, 2(2), 25.

Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York: The Guilford Press.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Dewanti Ratna Pertiwi, Maria Asumpta Deny Kusumaningrum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP is abstracted/indexed in the following databases:


Published by Faculty of Culture, Management, and Business
Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika
p-ISSN: 2355-0309 | e-ISSN : 2548-5865
email: [email protected]

 Jo-ELT (Journal of English Language Teaching) Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IKIP is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.