MINIMIZING STUDENTS’ ERRORS ON ANSWERING “YES/NO” QUESTIONS ON READING COMPREHENSION

Kamarudin Kamarudin

Abstract


This study is aimed at finding out the ways to minimize students’ error and factors encountered by the students on answering “yes/no” questions in reading comprehension at the first year students of SMPN 1 Sekotong. The number of population was 32 which were divided into 2 classes. The writer took 32 % of the students as the sample of the study or all of them. They were taken randomly as the sampling techniques to gain the data needed. The writer contributed a set of questionnaire which is consisted of 11 questions. The best ways to minimizing students’ error on answering “yes/no” questions in reading comprehension at the first year students of SMPN 1 Sekotong were Direct reference (45,7%) is very motivating, inference (37,1%) is fairly motivating, Supposition (42.9%) is motivating, Evaluation (37. 3%) is motivating. Some factors encountered by the students in answering “yes/no” questions in reading comprehension at the first year students of SMPN 1 Sekotong were Language transfer (22.9 %) is motivating factors by the respondents Intra lingual interference (28, 6%) is not motivating factors of respondents, The sociolinguistics situation (35.7%) is fairly motivating factors of the respondents, Age (31.4%) motivating factors of respondents, Modality (22, 9 %) is poorly motivating factor, Succession of approximate system (37.3%) is not motivating factors of the respondents, Universal hierarchy of difficulty (37.1%) not motivating factors of respondents. The methods of teaching and learning process in the class support in minimizing students’ error in answering “yes/no” questions very well.


Keywords


Students’ Error, “yes/no” Questions, Reading Comprehension.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, Suharsimin. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek (edisi revisi VI). Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Ary, Donald et al. 1985. Introduction to Research in Education: 3rd Edition. United States: Harcourt Brace College.

Alfassi, M. (2004), Zhang, Z (1993). Reading to learn: Effects of Combined Strategy Instruction on High School Students. Journal of Educational Research, 97(4): 171-184.

Brown, H.D. 1987. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New Jersey : Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliff.

Corder, S.P. 1975. Introducing Applied Linguistics. England: Hazell Watson and Viney Ltd.

Dulay, H., M. Burt, & Krashen, S. 1982. Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press.

Finnochioro and Brumfit, 1983. Visual Aids in Teaching English as a Second Language Teaching. New York: Ltd University Press.

Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Third Edition Completely Revised and Updated. Malaysia; Pearson Education.

Hadi, Sutrisno1988. Pengantar Penelitian Ilmiah. Bandung: Tarsito.

Heaton J. B. 1975. Writing English Language Performance Test. Singapore: Longman Group, Ltd.

Hennings, 1985. Communication III Action: Teaching the Language Arts. New Jersey: Kean College.

Hornby, AS. 1983. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. New York: Oxford University press.

Lado1990. Language Testing. Longman Group, Ltd.

Moire Chihombo, 1978. Toward Reality in Foreign Language Classroom. ELT Forum Vol. 7 Pg. 228.

Nunan, D (1992). Research method in language learning. New York: Cambridge university press.

Papas, George, 1970. Reading in the Primary School, the Second ed. Melbourne the Macmillan Company of Australia pity, ltd.

Richards J.C, et.al., 1974. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. USA: Cambridge University Press.

Samekto, Cecilia G, 1991. Popular Idioms for Everyday Occasions. Yogyakarta : PT Kanisius.

Simatupang M. and A. Ariyanto. 1990.Bahasa Inggris Ia : Untuk SMA. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka – Depdikbud.

Webster, A. Merriam. 1996. Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of The English Language. USA: Merriam Company.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Ilmiah IKIP Mataram