MODEL MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM SOLVING DENGAN STRATEGI KONFLIK KOGNITIF: SEBUAH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN UNTUK MELATIHKAN KEMAMPUAN ANALYTICALDECISION MAKING MAHASISWA CALON GURU

I Ketut Sukarma

Abstract


Analytical decision making is very important because it becomes the ultimate goal in learning. Analytical decision-making and objectives for making decisions based on the results of an analysis of information, data or facts, and phenomena, development models used to make analytical decisions. This study aims to develop a model of Mathematical Problem Solving with Conflict Cognitive Strategy to train the analytical decision-making ability of prospective teachers. This research is a development research that produces a valid model learning that is Mathematical Problem Solving with Conflict Cognitive Strategy to train analytical decision-making ability of the prospective teacher. The result of validity test obtained through focus group discussion activity shows that the developed model is valid. Components of validity that consist of content validity and constructs validity results are: 1) need: 4.55 (very valid); 2) state of the art: 4.45 (very valid); 3) construct: 4.4 (very valid). Meanwhile, the supporting learning devices developed include the lesson plan, Module, worksheet, and analytical decision analysis instrument are valid with average score 3.6 and 0.97 of reliability with the reliable category. Based on these results it can be concluded that the Mathematical Problem Solving model with Conflict Cognitive Strategy and it supporting learning device valid to train the analytical skills of Prospective teacher decision making.


Keywords


Mathematical Problem Solving Model with Conflict Cognitive Strategy, Analytical decision making

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adair, J. (2010). Decision Making and Problem Solving Strategies. Second Edition. Kogan Page. London.

Asy’ari, M., Prayogi, S., dan Samsuri, T., Muhali.(2016). Kajian Literatur tentang Berpikir Kritis, Berpikir Kreatif, dan Metakognisi dalam Pembelajaran. Prosiding Seminar Nasional PKPSM. 12 Maret 2016. Mataram, Indonesia. Hal 292-298.

Borich, G. D. 1994. Observation Skills for Effective Teaching. Macmilla. Publishing Company: New York.

Collette & Chiappetta, (1994). Science Instruction in The Middle and Scondary School. New York: Macmilian Publishing.

Duit, R., and Treagust, D. (2012). How Can Conceptual Change Contribute to Theory and Pratice in Science Education?. Second international handbook of science educations. 1(2): 107-118.

Facione, P. (2011). Critical Thinking. What It Is and Why Its Counts. Measured Reason and The California Academic Press. London.

Ibrahim, M. dan Wahyusukrtiningsih. (2014). Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Melalui Pemaknaan, (Belajar Perilaku Positif dari Alam). Unesa University Press. Surabaya.

Lunenburg, F. (2010). The Decision making Process.National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal. 27(4): 1-12.

Marcou, A., and Lerman, S. (2006). Towards the Development of A Self-Regulated Mathematical Problem Solving Model. Proceeding 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. -.-. 2006. In Novotná, J., Moraová, H., Krátká, M. & Stehlíková, N. (Eds.). Hal 137-144.

Mitrevski, B and Zajkov, O. (2011). Mathematics and Science Teachers’ Concept of Critical Thinking. Bulg. J. Phys. 38: 318–324.

National Research Council of Educational Academies. (2010). Exploring the Intersection of Science Education and 21st Century Skills. The National Academies Press.Washington, D.C.

Nieveen, N. (2007). Formative Evaluation in Educational Design Research. Proceedings of the seminar conducted at the East China Normal University. 23-26 November 2007. Shanghai, PR China. Hal 88-101.

Nur, M. (2011). Modul Keterampilan-keterampilan Proses dan Hakikat Sains. Surabaya: PSMS Unesa.

Onyekuru, B.U. (2015). Field Dependence-Field Independence Cognitive Style, Gender, Career Choice, and Academic Achievement of Secondary School Students in Emohua Local Government Area of River State.Journal of Education and Practice. 6(10): 76-85.

Permendiknas no. 73 tahun 2013 tentang Penerapan Kerangka Kualifikasi Nasional Indonesia (KKNI) pada bidang Pendidikan Tinggi.

Prayogi, S. (2013). Implementasi Model Inquiry untuk Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika. Laporan Hasil Penelitian. LPPM IKIP Mataram.

Prayogi, S., dan Asy’ari, M. (2013). Implementasi Model PBL (Problem Based Learning) untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Jurnal Prisma Sains Vol. 1, No. 1. pp (79-87).

Preiss, D.D., and Sternberg, R.J. (2010). Innovations in educational psychology: perspectives on learning, teaching, andhuman development. Springer: New York.

Schoenfeld, A. (2013). Reflection on Problem Solving Theory and Practice. The Mathematics Enthusiast.10(2): 9-34.

Schoenfeld, A. (2014). What Makes for Powerful Classrooms, and How Can We Support Teachers in Creating Them? A Story of Research and Practice, Productively Interviewed. Educational Researcher. 43(8): 404-412.

Shafir, E., and LeBoeuf, R. (2004). Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making: Context and Conflict in Multiattribute Choice. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Oxford.

Sukarma, I.K. (2013). Epistemology, Constructivism, and Discovery Learning in Mathematcs. Jurnal Prisma Sains. 1(1): 103-116.

Sukarma, I.K. (2015). Identifikasi Kemampuan Analisis dan Decision Making Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika IKIP Mataram. Laporan Hasil Penelitian. LPPM IKIP Mataram.

Thomas, G.P. (2012). Metacognition in science education: past, present and future considerations. Second international handbook of science educations. 1(2): 131-144.

Verawati, NN Sri P. (2013). Implementasi Model Inquiry untuk Mengembangkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika pada Pokok Bahasan Hukum Hooke. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi BIOTA. 6(1): 77-86.

Vosniadou, S. (2012).Reframing the Calssical Approach to Conceptual Change: Preconceptions, Misconceptions, and Synthetic Models.Second international handbook of science educations. 1(2): 119-130.

Wang, Y., and Ruhe, G. (2007). The Cognitive Process of Decision Making. International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intellegence. 1(2): 72-85.

Yuan, S. (2013). Incorporating Pólya’s Problem Solving Method in Remedial Math. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics. 3(1): 96-107.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Ilmiah IKIP Mataram