Integrating Augmented Reality into Problem-Based Learning: Effects on Elementary School Students' Critical Thinking in Science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v14i3.20928Keywords:
Augmented reality, Critical thinking, Problem-based learning, Science learningAbstract
Developing students' critical thinking skills has become an increasingly important educational priority in the era of artificial intelligence. Despite the growing use of Augmented Reality (AR) in education, empirical evidence regarding its effectiveness in fostering elementary school students' critical thinking in science remains limited, particularly when integrated with Problem-Based Learning (PBL). This study investigated the effect of AR-assisted PBL on elementary students' critical thinking skills in science. A quasi-experimental design with a non-equivalent pretest–posttest control group was employed involving 62 fifth-grade students (experimental group = 32; control group = 30). Both groups received identical problem-based science instruction on flora and fauna topics, while AR was integrated only into the experimental group. Students' critical thinking skills were assessed using an essay-based instrument developed according to the RED framework (Recognizing Assumptions, Evaluating Arguments, and Drawing Conclusions). Descriptive statistics and inferential analyses were conducted using an independent-samples t-test for the pretest and a one-tailed Mann–Whitney U test for the posttest. The findings revealed that students receiving AR-assisted PBL achieved significantly higher critical thinking scores than those receiving problem-based learning without AR (posttest mean = 81.72 vs. 75.83; p = 0.005), with a moderate educational effect (r = 0.329). These findings suggest that integrating interactive three-dimensional visualization within a problem-based learning environment facilitates scientific reasoning and supports the development of critical thinking beyond conceptual understanding alone. This study contributes to the growing literature on technology-enhanced science education by providing empirical evidence that AR functions most effectively as a pedagogical tool when embedded within inquiry-oriented learning environments. The findings also offer practical implications for designing more interactive and student-centered science instruction in elementary schools.
References
Adharini, D., & Herman, T. (2021). Didactical design of vectors in mathematics to develop creative thinking ability and self-confidence of Year 10 students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1), 012089. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012089
Agustiningsih, E., Tobing, V. M. O. L., & Purnamasari, H. (2026). The Effect of Animated Video Learning Media on Students’ Understanding and Independence in the Subject Science Lesson. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 14(2), 555–569. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v14i2.19490
Akbar, A., Herman, T., Suryadi, D., Mursalim, ., Alman, ., Putra, E. D., & Blegur, J. (2025). Integrating Augmented Reality in Mathematics Learning to Improve Critical Thinking Skills of Elementary School Students. Emerging Science Journal, 9(2), 764–779. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2025-09-02-014
Alkış-Küçükaydın, M. (2026). Science identity and critical thinking in primary school students: Serial mediating role of epistemic curiosity and need for cognition. The Journal of Educational Research, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2026.2628211
Arthi, M. P., & Gandhimathi, S. N. S. (2025). Research trends and network approach of critical thinking skills in English Language Teaching – A bibliometric analysis implementing R studio. Heliyon, 11(2), e42080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42080
Baki, N. U., Rafik-Galea, S., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2016). Malaysian Rural ESL Students Critical Thinking Literacy Level: A Case Study. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 4(4), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.4n.4p.71
Barakah, N., Suyidno, S., & Mahtari, S. (2026). Effectiveness of a Web-Based Guided Inquiry Platform on Dynamic Fluid Material to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 14(2), 649–657. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v14i2.18129
Cai, S., Liu, E., Shen, Y., Liu, C., Li, S., & Shen, Y. (2020). Probability learning in mathematics using augmented reality: impact on student’s learning gains and attitudes. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(5), 560–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1696839
Comstock, G., & Grühn, D. (2026). Assessing critical thinking about argumentative essays: the Critical Reasoning and Inference Test (CRIT). Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2026.2653881
Coştu, F. (2025). Exploring augmented reality (AR) in science education: Perspectives from gifted students. The Journal of Educational Research, 118(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2024.2431681
Cufuna, D. S. A., Rangel-de Lazaro, G., & Duart, J. M. (2025). Exploring the role of didactic strategies in the creation of augmented reality digital content by pre-service primary school teachers: A systematic literature review. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 41(2–3), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2025.2511600
Darwin, R. D., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Laksmi, E. D., & Marzuki. (2024). Critical thinking in the AI era: An exploration of EFL students’ perceptions, benefits, and limitations. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290342
Elford, D., Lancaster, S. J., & Jones, G. A. (2022). Exploring the Effect of Augmented Reality on Cognitive Load, Attitude, Spatial Ability, and Stereochemical Perception. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(3), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09957-0
Encabo-Fernández, E., Albarracín-Vivo, D., & Jerez-Martínez, I. (2023). Evaluative research on the critical thinking of primary school students. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 4, 100249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.10024
Ennis, R. H. (1964). A definition of critical thinking. The Reading Teacher, 17(8), 599–612.
Facione, P. A. (2009). Using the Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric to Train the Discovery of Evidence of Critical Thinking. Insight Assessment, California Academic Press, 1–5. https://www.insightassessment.com/wp-content/uploads/ia/pdf/Using-the-Holistic-Critical-Thinking-Scoring-Rubric-to-Train-Discovery-of-Evidence-of-Critical-Thinking.pdf
Fan, K., & See, B. H. (2022). How do Chinese students’ critical thinking compare with other students?: A structured review of the existing evidence. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101145
Harel, G. (2008). DNR perspective on mathematics curriculum and instruction, Part I: focus on proving. ZDM, 40(3), 487–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0104-1
Ilobinso, A., Lowell, V., White, S., & Jones, K. (2025). Impact of augmented reality-enhanced biological taxonomy instruction on students’ knowledge gains and science motivation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2025.2586526
Ivan, V., & Maat, S. M. (2024). The Usage of Augmented Reality Technology in Mathematics Education: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i1/20064
Jegstad, K. M., Heggernes, S. L., Jøsok, E., Ryen, E., Svanes, I. K., & Tørnby, H. (2025). Approaches to critical thinking in primary education classrooms: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 48, 100711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100711
Kazlaris, G. C., Keramopoulos, E., Bratsas, C., & Kokkonis, G. (2025). Augmented Reality in Education Through Collaborative Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 9(9), 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti9090094
Kirk, M., Tytler, R., & White, P. (2023). Critical thinking in primary science through a guided inquiry pedagogy: A semiotic perspective. Teachers and Teaching, 29(6), 615–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2023.2191181
Li, F., Wang, X., He, X., Cheng, L., & Wang, Y. (2023). How augmented reality affected academic achievement in K-12 education – a meta-analysis and thematic-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5582–5600. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2012810
Liikonen, L., Erkkilä, A., Kamula, T., Honkanen, E., Liimatainen, K., Uhlgren, V.-V., Yrttimaa, T., Nummenmaa, T., Hamari, J., & Vastaranta, M. (2026). Augmented reality game mechanics influence the accuracy of crowdsourced LiDAR-based tree measurements. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 121, 129466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2026.129466
Liu, L., & Shen, H. (2026). Fostering Critical Thinking Through STEM Undergraduate Research: Mechanisms and Challenges in a Chinese Research University. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 61, 102173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2026.102173
Mohammadpour-Rozehkhani, Z., Sakian Mohamadi, H., Pouralvar, K., & Dadjoo, M. (2025). The effect of immersive technologies in the educational methods on the recall and recognition of sixth-grade students. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 22(3), 410–423. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-12-2024-0329
Mullis, I. V. ., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hopper, M. (2016). Timss 2015 International Results in Mathematics. In TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. http://timss2015.org/timss-2015/science/student-achievement/distribution-of-science-achievement/
Pozzo, V., Zanchetta-Balint, E., Benjoar, M.-D., Larcher, Q., Romano, G., & Lantieri, L. (2026). Microscope-integrated augmented reality for lymphaticovenous anastomosis: Improving identification, reproducibility, and efficiency control. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 117, 219–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2026.05.016
Prananta, A. W., Biroli, A., & Afifudin, M. (2024). Augmented Reality for Science Learning in the 21st Century: Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(SpecialIssue), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10iSpecialIssue.8099
Rusli, R., Nalanda, D. A., Tarmidi, A. D. V., Suryaningrum, K. M., & Yunanda, R. (2023). Augmented reality for studying hands on the human body for elementary school students. Procedia Computer Science, 216, 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.132
Salido, A., Sugiman, S., Firdaus, F. M., Prihatmojo, A., Herwanto, A., Yuni Andari, E., Wulandari, W. S., & Midani Rizki, L. (2025). Uncovering Critical Thinking and Mathematical Representation Skills of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers Through Cognitive Style. Qubahan Academic Journal, 5(2), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v5n2a1505
Salido, A., Syarif, I., Sitepu, M. S., Suparjan, Wana, P. R., Taufika, R., & Melisa, R. (2025). Integrating critical thinking and artificial intelligence in higher education: A bibliometric and systematic review of skills and strategies. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101924
Sari, F. I., Herlina, K., Rosidin, U., Distrik, I. W., & Festiana, I. (2026). Needs Analysis for Developing STEM-PjBL-Based Student Worksheets to Support Creative Problem Solving in Alternative Energy Learning. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 14(2), 491–503. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v14i2.19051
Sari, R. M., Sumarmi, S., Astina, I. K., Utomo, D. H., & Ridhwan, R. (2021). Increasing Students Critical Thinking Skills and Learning Motivation Using Inquiry Mind Map. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 16(03), 4. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i03.16515
Siswati, B. H., Amalia, D. R., Kurniawan, A., & Naohiro, O. (2026). Gamified Inquiry-Based Learning to Enhance Critical Thinking in Biology Education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0047231X.2026.2662021
Steffe, L. P., & Ulrich, C. (2020). Constructivist Teaching Experiment. In Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 134–141). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_32
Suryadi, D. (2019). Penelitian Desain Didaktis (DDR) dan Implementasinya. Gapura Press.
Susanto, R., & Hapudin, M. S. (2024). Improving Primary School Students Critical Thinking Abilities with the Help of Online Media: Effective Learning Strategies in Elementary Schools. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 11(2), 252–267. https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v11i2.71790
Syskowski, S., Wilfinger, S., & Huwer, J. (2024). Impact and Classification of Augmented Reality in Science Experiments in Teaching—A Review. Education Sciences, 14(7), 760. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070760
Watson, G., & Glaser, E. (2012). Critical Thinking Appraisal User-Guide and Technical Manual. Pearson Education.
Widaya, N. R., Istianah, F., & Prahani, B. K. (2026). Elementary School Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Through Food Chain Learning Indicators. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 12(1), 141–147. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v12i1.16472
Wiraha, M. A., & Sudarma, I. K. (2023). Augmented Reality-Oriented Problem-Based Learning in Natural Science Materials. International Journal of Elementary Education, 7(3), 458–466. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v7i3.60618
Wu, J., Jiang, H., Long, L., & Zhang, X. (2024). Effects of AR mathematical picture books on primary school students’ geometric thinking, cognitive load and flow experience. Education and Information Technologies, 29(18), 24627–24652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12768-y
Zhang, C., Zhou, Y., Wijaya, T. T., Chen, J., & Ning, Y. (2024). Effects of a problem posing instructional interventions on student learning outcomes: A three-level meta-analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 53, 101587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101587
Zoya, K., A., E. P., Max, W., Christoph, H., Stefan, K., Jochen, K., & I., H. S. (2026). Exploring the role of conceptual knowledge and representational competence in an augmented reality physics environment. Computers & Education, 252, 105658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105658
Zuzano, F., Musdi, E., & Lufri, L. (2025). Designing a Hypothetical Learning Trajectory with Open-Ended Tasks: An Approach to Teaching Angle Measurement. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(3), 1563–1572. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i3.6837
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yuni Krisnawati, Sandra Arhesa, Hos Arie Rhamadhan Sibarani, Ady Akbar, Achmad Salido
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
