Equity in Science Education: A Comparative Analysis of Biology Laboratory Management in Urban and Rural Public Senior High Schools in Sumedang Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v14i3.20856Keywords:
Biology laboratory management, Educational equity, Urban-rural disparity, Science learning, School accreditation, Practicum accessAbstract
Educational equity in biology education requires not only the formal availability of laboratories but also students’ access to functional equipment, safe practicum environments, institutional support, and opportunities to conduct inquiry-based activities. This exploratory comparative case study examined biology laboratory management in two A-accredited public senior high schools in Sumedang Regency, West Java: SMAN 1 Sumedang as an urban school and SMAN Rancakalong as a rural school. Data were collected from April to May 2026 through structured observation, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis. The interview component involved ten purposively selected participants consisting of two school administrators, two biology teachers who also served as laboratory managers, and six Grade XI students. The observation instrument included 48 indicators across 11 aspects of laboratory management. Data were analyzed thematically using Bafadal’s four management functions: planning, organizing, implementation, and supervision. The findings show that both schools experienced serious operational weaknesses despite their A accreditation status. Written laboratory schedules were absent, laboratory work programs were either unavailable or blank, no trained laboratory technician was assigned, only about six of 34 microscopes in the urban school and seven of 20 microscopes in the rural school were functional, laboratory documentation was outdated or unused, and occupational health and safety compliance reached only approximately 25%. The urban school had relatively better physical infrastructure, whereas the rural school experienced more severe limitations in students’ independent access to microscopes and authentic practicum activities. The study contributes case-based evidence that accreditation status may mask operational weaknesses in laboratory functionality and inequitable practicum access. Strengthening laboratory personnel, equipment maintenance, documentation, safety facilities, and accreditation indicators based on actual laboratory use is essential for improving equity in science education.
References
Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305
Adam, W., Taslim, A. M., & Aziza, N. (2026). Identification of science laboratory service quality from the perspective of junior high school students in Majene Regency using the importance performance analysis method. Journal of Science Education Research, 10(1), 178–188. https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v10i1.90072
Bafadal, I. (2008). Manajemen sarana dan prasarana sekolah. Bumi Aksara.
Efendi, N., & Jayanti, A. S. L. (2024). Optimizing science laboratory management for enhanced student learning outcomes. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v19i4.1185
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
Irawan, S., Tagela, U., & Windrawanto, Y. (2020). Hubungan akreditasi sekolah dan supervisi oleh kepala sekolah dengan kualitas sekolah. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/jamp.v8i2.33905
Kartiniasih, N. N., Yudana, I. M., & Sunu, I. G. K. A. (2017). Peranan penilaian akreditasi sekolah dalam peningkatan mutu satuan pendidikan di SMP Negeri 1 Melaya. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan Indonesia, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/japi.v8i1.2258
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2023). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 22 Tahun 2023 tentang standar sarana dan prasarana pada pendidikan anak usia dini, jenjang pendidikan dasar, dan jenjang pendidikan menengah.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mohzana, M., Murcahyanto, H., Fahrurrozi, M., & Supriadi, Y. N. (2023). Optimization of management of laboratory facilities in the process of learning science at high school. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(10), 8226–8234. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.5249
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I and II): Country note: Indonesia. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Palisoa, N., & Lumaela, M. K. (2022). Utilization of the laboratory and application of science process skills to increase student learning outcomes on the concepts of electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions class X SMA. Molluca Journal of Chemistry Education, 13(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.30598/MJoCEvol13iss1pp32-39
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 24 Tahun 2007. (2007). Standar sarana dan prasarana untuk SD/MI, SMP/MTs, dan SMA/MA. Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.
Puspita, I., & Wulandari, R. (2026). Management of junior high school science laboratory for students’ practical activities. Academia Open, 11(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.11.2026.12329
Rahmadani, B. M., Buntu, A., Laenggeng, A. H., Rauf, A., & Astija. (2025). Efektivitas pemanfaatan laboratorium biologi terhadap hasil belajar siswa di SMA Negeri 1 Tikke Raya. Bioscientist: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 13(3), 2504–2512. https://doi.org/10.33394/bioscientist.v13i3.18059
Rahmawati, D., Zulkhairi, Z., Fitriyani, F., et al. (2024a). Analisis kelengkapan peralatan laboratorium biologi di SMA: Perbandingan antara standar nasional dan realitas di lapangan. Diklabio: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Biologi, 9(1), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.33369/diklabio.9.1.146-154
Rahmawati, D., Zulkhairi, Z., Fitriyani, F., et al. (2024b). Optimization of laboratory quality management in improving student competence. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/m6rxc794
Rizkiyah, N., et al. (2025). Analisis profil laboratorium biologi di SMAN 1 Pemangkat Kabupaten Sambas sesuai standar Kemendikbud RI. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 10(1), 204–210. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.10.1.204-210
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Alfabeta.
Suharyanto, A., et al. (2020). Pengelolaan laboratorium IPA di SMA Negeri 3 Bengkulu Selatan. Manajer Pendidikan, 15(2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.33369/mapen.v15i2.13744
Tadesse, Y., Mesfin, H., & Assefa, S. (2025). Enhancing secondary school students’ science process skills through guided inquiry-based laboratory experiments enriched instruction. PLOS ONE, 20(4), e0320692. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320692
Thobi, T. (2022). Upaya peningkatan mutu pendidikan melalui manajemen akreditasi sekolah. Jurnal Manajemen Mutu Pendidikan, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.23960/jmmp.v10.i2.2022.06
Tuaputty, H., Alimudi, S., Arini, I., Latupeirissa, L. N., & Donkor, A. K. (2023). Project-based learning using a laboratory approach on learning outcomes and critical thinking in marine biology. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 9(1), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v9i1.24551
UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education: All means all. UNESCO.
Waruwu, M. (2023). Pendekatan penelitian pendidikan: Metode penelitian kualitatif, metode penelitian kuantitatif dan metode penelitian kombinasi. AfniPublisher.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Risma Yunita, Taufani Chusnul Kurniatun, Eka Prihatin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

