Metacognitive Inquiry-Based Science Modules: A Need Analysis of Elementary Pre-Service Teachers’ Science Process Skills

Authors

  • Syahriani Yulianci STKIP Taman Siswa Bima
  • Nurjumiati Nurjumiati STKIP Taman Siswa Bima
  • Baiq Dina Hardianti Universitas Qamarul Huda Badaruddin Bagu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v14i3.20835

Keywords:

Metacognitive, Inquiry-based learning, Science process skills , Needs analysis, Pre-service elementary school teachers

Abstract

Science Process Skills (SPS) are essential competencies for prospective elementary school teachers, yet PGSD students often have limited opportunities to develop these skills through inquiry-based learning. This study analyzed students’ needs for developing an inquiry-based science module with a metacognitive orientation to enhance SPS. A quantitative descriptive survey was conducted with 60 PGSD students who had completed a science course. Data were collected using a needs analysis questionnaire covering five student characteristics and three SPS need dimensions. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, item-level correlation, and the Mann–Whitney U test were employed. Learning styles and preferences showed the highest mean score (M = 3.031), whereas learning experience had the lowest (M = 2.292), indicating limited exposure to laboratory and inquiry-based learning. All SPS need dimensions were rated very high, with module requirements obtaining the highest mean score (M = 3.654). Although no significant relationships were found between overall student characteristics and SPS needs, item-level analysis revealed a positive correlation between the ability to relate science concepts to everyday life and awareness of SPS gaps (r = 0.319, p = 0.027), and a negative correlation between difficulties in understanding abstract concepts and module requirements (r = −0.397, p = 0.005). Students with lower academic ability reported significantly greater module needs (p = 0.012). These findings support the development of a differentiated inquiry-based science module integrated with metacognitive strategies to improve SPS among prospective elementary school teachers.

References

Andromeda, A., Ellizar, E., Iryani, I., Yerimadesi, Y. & Rahmah, F. (2019). The effectiveness of guided inquiry based colloid system modules integrated experiments on science process skills and student learning outcomes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317(1), Article 012141. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012141

Arantika, J., Saputro, S., & Mulyani, S. (2019). Effectiveness of guided inquiry-based module to improve science process skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157, Article 042019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042019

Asilevi, M. N., Kärkkäinen, S., Sormunen, K., & Havu-Nuutinen, S. (2024). A comparison of science learning skills in the teacher-centered approach and inquiry-based science fieldwork: Primary school students' perceptions. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology, 12(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3146

Asriyadin, A., Yulianci, S., Kaniawati, I., & Liliawati, W. (2021). The formation of students’ scientific attitudes through the neuroscience-based inquiry model in physics learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330, Article 050028. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043348

Avargil, S., Lavi, R., & Dori, Y. J. (2018). Students’ metacognition and metacognitive strategies in science education. In Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education: Learning, teaching and assessment (pp. 33–64). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_3

Bidarra, J., & Rusman, E. (2017). Towards a pedagogical model for science education: Bridging educational contexts through a blended learning approach. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 32(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2016.1265442

Chengere, A. M., Bono, B. D., Zinabu, S. A., & Jilo, K. W. (2025). Enhancing secondary school students’ science process skills through guided inquiry-based laboratory activities in biology. PLOS ONE, 20(4), Article e0320692. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320692

Constantinou, C. P., Tsivitanidou, O. E., & Rybska, E. (2018). What is inquiry-based science teaching and learning? In Professional development for inquiry-based science teaching and learning (pp. 1–23). Springer.

Cukurova, M., Bennett, J., & Abrahams, I. (2017). Students’ knowledge acquisition and ability to apply knowledge into different science contexts in two different independent learning settings. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1336709

Drigas, A., & Mitsea, E. (2020). The 8 pillars of metacognition. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(21), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i21.14907

Ekici, M., & Erdem, M. (2020). Developing science process skills through mobile scientific inquiry. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, Article 100658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100658

Erduran, S., & Kaya, E. (2018). Drawing nature of science in pre-service science teacher education: Epistemic insight through visual representations. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1133–1149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9773-0

Falloon, G. (2019). Using simulations to teach young students science concepts: An experiential learning theoretical analysis. Computers & Education, 135, 138–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.001

Fitria, Y., Hasanah, F. N., & Gistituati, N. (2018). Critical thinking skills of prospective elementary school teachers in integrated science-mathematics lectures. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 12(4), 597–603. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v12i4.9633

Gannar, S., & Kilani, C. (2025). Contextualized learning and social constructivism: Implementing a project-based approach in information systems development education. Journal of Science Learning, 8(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v8i1.72667

García-Carmona, A., Criado, A. M., & Cruz-Guzmán, M. (2017). Primary pre-service teachers’ skills in planning a guided scientific inquiry. Research in Science Education, 47(5), 989–1010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9536-8

Geng, X., & Su, Y.-S. (2025). The effects of different metacognitive patterns on students’ self-regulated learning in blended learning. Computers & Education, 227, Article 105211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105211

Ghanizadeh, A. (2016). The interplay between reflective thinking, critical thinking, self-monitoring, and academic achievement in higher education. Higher Education, 74(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0031-y

Gizaw, G., & Sota, S. (2023). Improving science process skills of students: A review of literature. Science Education International, 34(3), 216–224.

Hamzah, H., Hamzah, M. I., & Zulkifli, H. (2022). Systematic literature review on the elements of metacognition-based higher order thinking skills (HOTS) teaching and learning modules. Sustainability, 14(2), Article 813. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020813

Hawe, E., Lightfoot, U., & Dixon, H. (2017). First-year students working with exemplars: Promoting self-efficacy, self-monitoring and self-regulation. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2017.1349894

Idris, N., Talib, O., & Razali, F. (2022). Strategies in mastering science process skills in science experiments: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 155–170.

Kang, J., & Keinonen, T. (2018). The effect of student-centered approaches on students’ interest and achievement in science: Relevant topic-based, open and guided inquiry-based, and discussion-based approaches. Research in Science Education, 48(4), 865–885.

Labouta, H. I., Kenny, N. A., Li, R., Anikovskiy, M., Reid, L., & Cramb, D. T. (2018). Learning science by doing science: An authentic science process-learning model in postsecondary education. International Journal of Science Education, 40(12), 1476–1492.

Martirosov, A. L., & Moser, L. R. (2021). Team-based learning to promote the development of metacognitive awareness and monitoring in pharmacy students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 85(2), Article 848112. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe848112

Masithah, I., Jufri, A. W., & Ramdani, A. (2022). Bahan ajar IPA berbasis inkuiri untuk meningkatkan literasi sains. Journal of Classroom Action Research, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/jcar.v4i1.1758

Mastrothanais, K., Kalianou, M., Katsifi, S., & Zouganali, A. (2018). The use of metacognitive knowledge and regulation strategies of students with and without special learning difficulties. International Journal of Special Education, 33(1), 184–200.

Morokuhi, Y. C., Walanda, D. K., Santoso, T., Ningsih, P., & Aminah, S. (2025). Using guided inquiry-based electronic science worksheets assisted by virtual laboratories on the science process skills of middle school students. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 14(3), 524–533. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v14i3.94342

Murphy, L., Eduljee, N. B., & Croteau, K. (2021). Teacher-centered versus student-centered teaching: Preferences and differences across academic majors. Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education, 4(1), 18–39. https://doi.org/10.36021/jethe.v4i1.156

Ngozi, P. O. (2021). Enhancing science process skills acquisition in chemistry among secondary school students through context-based learning. Science Education International, 32(4), 323–330. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v32.i4.7

Nouri, N., Saberi, M., McComas, W. F., & Mohammadi, M. (2021). Proposed teacher competencies to support effective nature of science instruction: A meta-synthesis of the literature. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(6), 601–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1871206

Nurjumiati, Syahriani Yulianci, & Asriyadin. (2022). Pengaruh model inquiry berbasis literasi numerasi terhadap kemampuan pemodelan matematis dan bahasa simbolik fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 12(3), 945–948. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v12i3.714

Nurjumiati, N., Yulianci, S., Adawiyah, R., & Putri, M. R. N. (2025). Analisis diagnosis awal keterampilan proses sains mahasiswa PGSD pada mata kuliah Konsep Dasar IPA. Galaxy: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA dan Teknologi, 2(2), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.59923/galaxy.v2i2.720

Özer, F., & Sarıbaş, D. (2023). Exploring pre-service science teachers’ understanding of scientific inquiry and scientific practices through a laboratory course. Science & Education, 32(3), 787–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00325-3

Öztürk, B. (2023). Relation of 21st-century skills with science education: Prospective elementary teachers’ evaluation. Educational Academic Research, 50, 126–139.

Ozturk, N. (2017). Assessing metacognition: Theory and practices. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 4(2), 134-148. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.298299

Prayogi, S., Ahzan, S., Indriaturrahmi, & Rokhmat, J. (2023). The validity and effectiveness of the ethnoscience-loaded inquiry learning model to improve students’ critical thinking skills. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities 2023 (IJCAH 2023) (pp. 1877–1885). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-152-4_189

Prykhodkina, N., Tsynova, M., Kravets, H., Hrechanovska, O., & Nichyshyna, V. (2025). The role of interactive technologies in improving the quality of learning and development of scientific competences in modern education. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 13(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v13.i1.253

Rivas, S. F., Saiz, C., & Ossa, C. (2022). Metacognitive strategies and development of critical thinking in higher education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 913219. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913219

Saar, M., Ljalikova, A., Theophilou, E., Alkhasawneh, S. N., & Hernández-Leo, D. (2026). Empowering teachers to enhance student high order thinking skills with artificial intelligence educational tools. In K. Tammets, S. Sosnovsky, R. Ferreira Mello, G. Pishtari, & T. Nazaretsky (Eds.), Two decades of TEL. From lessons learnt to challenges ahead (pp. 442–456). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-03870-8_30

Shah, R. K. (2025). Pedagogy in practice: Theoretical frameworks, instructional strategies, and contextual influences. Deep Science Publishing. https://doi.org/10.70593/978-93-49307-63-6

Sitaresmi, P. D. W., Fadilah, Y., & Fadhilah, N. (2024). Development of elementary students’ learning independence instrument. Proceeding of International Conference of Religion, Health, Education, Science and Technology, 1(1), 297–304. https://doi.org/10.35316/icorhestech.v1i1.5647

Soysal, Y. (2025). Science teachers’ conceptual perspectives on scientific experiments: A metaphorical representation. Research in Science & Technological Education, 43(4), 1182–1207. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2024.2440391

Tachie, S. A. (2019). Meta-cognitive skills and strategies application: How this helps learners in mathematics problem-solving. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(5), Article em1702. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/105364

Tina, T., Budiaman, B., & Hasanah, U. (2020). Pengaruh strategi pembelajaran metakognitif terhadap kemampuan memecahkan masalah lingkungan dalam pembelajaran sains. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Lingkungan dan Pembangunan, 21(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.21009/plpb.211.02

Widyaningsih, D. A. (2020). Analysis of science process skills on science learning in primary school. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education (ICLIQE 2019) (pp. 679–687).

Williams, P. J., Nguyen, N., & Mangan, J. (2017). Using technology to support science inquiry learning. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 7(1), 26–57. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.234

Woods, P. J., & Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2024). Examining the role of student-centered versus teacher-centered pedagogical approaches to self-directed learning through teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 138, Article 104415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104415

Yulianci, S., Asriyadin, Nurjumiati, Kaniawati, I., Liliawati, W., & Muliana. (2021). Preliminary analysis of module development by setting arguments through the application of scientific inquiry models to improve students’ scientific attitudes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), Article 012021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012021

Yulianci, S., Gunawan, G., & Doyan, A. (2017). The effect of guided inquiry model with interactive multimedia towards student’s generic science skill based on learning styles. In Proceedings of the 2nd Asian Education Symposium (AES 2017) (Vol. 1, pp. 193–198). SciTePress. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007301001930198

Downloads

Published

2026-07-05

How to Cite

Yulianci, S., Nurjumiati, N., & Hardianti, B. D. (2026). Metacognitive Inquiry-Based Science Modules: A Need Analysis of Elementary Pre-Service Teachers’ Science Process Skills. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 14(3), 1781–1796. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v14i3.20835

Issue

Section

Research Articles