Strengthening Elementary School Teachers’ Competence through the Integration of Psychological Well-Being, TPACK, and Enjoyable Numeracy Learning

Authors

  • Fitri Kania Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Mubiar Agustin Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Asep Deni Gustiana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Idat Muqodas Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Dinda Robayanti Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1957-6153
  • Dwi Yunita Utami Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/jpu.v7i4.22459

Keywords:

Teacher Competence, Mentoring, Numeracy Literacy, Psychological Well-Being, TPACK

Abstract

This community service program aims to enhance elementary school teachers’ understanding of psychological well-being, learning motivation, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK), and engaging numeracy instruction through an integrated professional development approach. Implemented in collaboration with SDN 200 Leuwi Panjang in Bandung, Indonesia, the program involved participatory training across four interconnected areas: teacher motivation and positive teacher–student relationships, psychological well-being, TPACK-based instruction, and engaging, context-based numeracy learning. The activities incorporated interactive presentations, guided discussions, and reflective learning experiences. Program outcomes were evaluated through pretest and posttest assessments administered using the Wayground platform, complemented by training observations and activity documentation. The evaluation included 36 teachers with valid paired assessment scores. The mean score increased from 19.509 to 24.960, representing an absolute gain of 5.451 points and a relative increase of 27.94%. Furthermore, 32 participants (88.89%) achieved higher posttest scores than their pretest scores. These findings indicate positive short-term improvements in participants’ overall understanding of the training materials. The program highlights the potential of integrated professional development to promote psychologically supportive teaching, technology-enhanced instruction, and context-based numeracy learning in elementary education. However, further evaluation is needed to determine whether these improvements translate into sustained changes in classroom practice.

References

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Cilliers, J., Fleisch, B., Kotze, J., Mohohlwane, M., & Taylor, S. (2022). The Challenge of Sustaining Effective Teaching: Spillovers, Fade-out, and the Cost-effectiveness of Teacher Development Programs. Economics of Education Review, 87, 102215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102215

Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2012). School Climate and Social-Emotional Learning: Predicting Teacher Stress, Job Satisfaction, and Teaching Efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1189–1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029356

Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140

Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915

Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional Development and Teacher Change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512

Hascher, T., & Waber, J. (2021). Teacher well-being: A systematic review of the research literature from the year 2000–2019. Educational Research Review, 34, 100411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100411

Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching and the Mathematical Quality of Instruction: An Exploratory Study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802177235

Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching on Student Achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002371

Jiménez Sierra, Á. A., Ortega Iglesias, J. M., Cabero-Almenara, J., & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2023). Development of the teacher’s technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) from the Lesson Study: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1078913. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1078913

Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Klassen, R. M., Perry, N. E., & Frenzel, A. C. (2012). Teachers’ Relatedness With Students: An Underemphasized Component of Teachers’ Basic Psychological Needs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026253

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education.

O’Sullivan, K., O’Meara, N., Goos, M., & Conway, P. (2025). The “N” Framework: A Teacher Knowledge Framework for Numeracy across the Curriculum. Numeracy, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.18.2.1481

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069

Schildkamp, K., van der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020). Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602

Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009

von Hagen, A., Balbi, A., Bonilla, M., & Arbildi, C. (2025). What do we mean when we talk about teacher professional development in formative assessment? A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 131, 102586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102586

Published

2026-11-02

How to Cite

Kania, F., Agustin, M., Gustiana, A. D., Muqodas, I., Robayanti, D., & Utami, D. Y. (2026). Strengthening Elementary School Teachers’ Competence through the Integration of Psychological Well-Being, TPACK, and Enjoyable Numeracy Learning. Jurnal Pengabdian UNDIKMA, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.33394/jpu.v7i4.22459

Citation Check