Digital Technology Approach in Scientific Writing: Artificial Intelligence Training for Teachers and Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33394/jpu.v7i2.21799Keywords:
scientific writing, artificial intelligence, knowledge sharing, Participatory LearningAbstract
This study aims to improve the scientific writing skills of teachers and students through the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) technology. The community service program employed two main approaches, namely knowledge sharing and participatory learning, which included lectures, hands-on training, group discussions, case studies, and practical exercises on the use of AI tools for scientific writing. The results demonstrated improvements in participants' scientific writing skills, enhanced understanding of AI concepts, and greater proficiency in applying AI technology throughout the writing process. Furthermore, the program improved the quality of scientific writing, increased participants' interest and confidence in producing scientific papers, and promoted the effective integration of AI technology into academic writing practices. Overall, this community service program contributes positively to the development of scientific writing competencies among teachers and students.
References
Al-Naqbi, A. K. (2010). The degree to which UAE primary science workbooks promote scientific inquiry. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(3), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2010.506316
Anantrasirichai, N., & Bull, D. (2022). Artificial intelligence in the creative industries: A review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55(1), 589–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10039-7
BaHammam, A. S. (2023). Balancing innovation and integrity: The role of AI in research and scientific writing. Nature and Science of Sleep, 15, 1153–1156. https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S455765
Banerjee, M., Chiew, D., Patel, K. T., Johns, L., Chappell, D., Linton, N., Cole, G. D., Francis, D. P., Szram, J., Ross, J., & Zaman, S. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence on clinical education: Perceptions of postgraduate trainee doctors in London (UK) and recommendations for trainers. BMC Medical Education, 21, Article 429. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02870-x
Çetin, P. S., & Eymur, G. (2017). Developing students’ scientific writing and presentation skills through argument-driven inquiry: An exploratory study. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(7), 837–843. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00915
Del Giglio, A., & da Costa, M. U. P. (2023). The use of artificial intelligence to improve the scientific writing of non-native English speakers. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 69(9), e20230560. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20230560
Deta, U. A., Mubarok, H., Mustar, Y. S., Kohar, A. W., & Ghofur, M. A. (2022). Study of perceptions and obstacles from postgraduate education students about scientific publication as a graduation requirement. International Journal of Current Educational Research, 1(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.53621/ijocer.v1i2.188
Fitriani, N. (2022). EFL students’ perceptions of the causes of scientific writing anxiety. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(1), 287–299. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v10i1.2637
Flanagin, A., Bibbins-Domingo, K., Berkwits, M., & Christiansen, S. L. (2023). Nonhuman “authors” and implications for the integrity of scientific publication and medical knowledge. JAMA, 329(8), 637–639. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.1344
Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005
Kacena, M. A., Plotkin, L. I., & Fehrenbacher, J. C. (2024). The use of artificial intelligence in writing scientific review articles. Current Osteoporosis Reports, 22(1), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-023-00852-0
Kaharuddin, Ahmad, D., Mardiana, Latif, I., Arafah, B., & Suryadi, R. (2024). Defining the role of artificial intelligence in improving English writing skills among Indonesian students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(2), 568–578. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1502.25
Khabib, S. (2022). Introducing artificial intelligence (AI)-based digital writing assistants for teachers in writing scientific articles. Teaching English as a Foreign Language Journal, 1(2), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.12928/tefl.v1i2.249
Maral, M. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of global research on scientific writing. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 44(3), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.44.3.19534
Muslimin, I. (2024). The use of ChatGPT to improve scientific article productivity of postgraduate students. Journal of Education Management and Instruction, 3(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.22515/jemin.v3i1.7352
Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence-powered digital writing assistant in higher education: Randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7(5), e07014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014
Rabbianty, E. N., Azizah, S., & Virdyna, N. K. (2023). AI in academic writing: Assessing current usage and future implications. INSANIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan, 28(1a), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v28i1a.9278
Shah, J., Shah, A., & Pietrobon, R. (2009). Scientific writing of novice researchers: What difficulties and encouragements do they encounter? Academic Medicine, 84(4), 511–516. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819a8c3c
Švab, I., Klemenc-Ketiš, Z., & Zupanič, S. (2023). New challenges in scientific publications: Referencing, artificial intelligence and ChatGPT. Slovenian Journal of Public Health, 62(3), 109–112. https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2023-0015
Verhoeven, F., Wendling, D., & Prati, C. (2023). ChatGPT: When artificial intelligence replaces the rheumatologist in medical writing. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 82(8), 1015–1017. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2023-223936
Wale, B. D., & Kassahun, Y. F. (2024). The transformative power of AI writing technologies: Enhancing EFL writing instruction through the integrative use of Writerly and Google Docs. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2024, Article 9221377. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9221377
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
