Strengthening the Tension of Socio-Scientific Issues Based Learning to Promoting Democratic Life : A Systematic Review

Laras Firdaus, Hunaepi Hunaepi, Herdiyana Fitriani, Taufik Samsuri

Abstract


Currently, Socio-Scientific Issues (SSI) are a learning approach that is widely used by educators, not only helping students to understand a topic but also improving students' scientific literacy skills, such as critical thinking, argumentation skills, and decision-making. Various studies related to SSI have been published but cannot provide specific recommendations for future SSI studies. Therefore, a research systematic review of literature related to SSI was carried out to identify and determine research trends related to SSI as a basis for conducting further SSI studies. In conducting this literature review, we collected SSI-related information from the Google Scholar publication database using socio-scientific issues as search keywords. In collecting and selecting it using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis), 155 articles were found that met the predetermined criteria for further analysis using Vosviewer. From the results of the analysis that has been done, decision-making is an item that has been studied a lot related to SSI. Thus, this item (decision-making) is recommended for further study.

Keywords


Socio-Scientific Issues, PRISMA, Vosviewer.

Full Text:

Full Paper

References


Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. (2015). The Relationship Between the Number of Authors of a Publication, its Citations and the Impact Factor of the Publishing Journal: Evidence from Italy. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 746-761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.07.003

Anwar, N. P., & Ali, M. A. (2020). The Effect of Socio-Scientific Issue (SSI) Based Discussion: A Student-Centred Approach to the Teaching of Argumentation. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the South, 4(2), 76-89. https://doi.org/10.36615/sotls.v4i2.76

Atabey, N., & Arslan, A. (2020). The Effect of Teaching Socio-Scientific Issues with Cooperative Learning Model on Pre-Service Teachers’ Argumentation Qualities. İlköğretim Online, 19(2), 491-514. http://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.689681

Atabey, N., & Topcu, M. S. (2017). The Development of a Socioscientific Issues-Based Curriculum Unit for Middle School Students: Global Warming Issue. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(3), 153-170. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.296027

Barrue, C., & Albe, V. (2013). Citizenship Education and Socioscientific Issues: Implicit Concept of Citizenship in the Curriculum, Views of French Middle School Teachers. Science & Education, 22(5), 1089-1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9571-4

Baytelman, A., Iordanou, K., & Constantinou, C. P. (2020). Epistemic Beliefs and Prior Knowledge as Predictors of the Construction of Different Types of Arguments on Socioscientific Issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(8), 1199-1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21627

Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to Plan and Perform a Qualitative Study Using Content Analysis. Nursing Plus Open, 2(1), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001

Beniermann, A., Mecklenburg, L., & Upmeier zu Belzen, A. (2021). Reasoning on Controversial Science Issues in Science Education and Science Communication. Education Sciences, 11(9), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090522

Bilican, K. (2018). Analysis of Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Understanding of Nature of Science and Proposed Arguments on Socio-Scientific Issues. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(2), 420-435. http://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.410632

Birmingham, D. J., & Barton, A. C. (2013). Putting on a Green Carnival: Youth Taking Educated Action on Socioscientific Issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 286-314. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21127

Bossér, U., & Lindahl, M. (2020). Students’ Use of Open-Minded Attitude and Elaborate Talk in Group Discussion and Role-Playing Debate on Socioscientific Issues. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9127

Bote, V. P. G., Gómez, C. O., & Anegón, F. d. M. (2013). Quantifying the Benefits of International Scientific Collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 392-404. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22754

Çalik, M., Turan, B., & Coll, R. (2014). A Cross-Age Study of Elementary Student Teachers’scientific Habits of Mind Concerning Socioscientific Issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 1315-1340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9458-0

Capkinoglu, E., Yilmaz, S., & Capkinoglu, E. (2020). Quality of Argumentation by Seventh‐Graders in Local Socioscientific Issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(6), 827-855. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21609

Carmona, A. G. (2021). Learning About the Nature of Science Through the Critical and Reflective Reading of News on the COVID-19 Pandemic. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 16(4), 1015-1028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10092-2

Cayci, B. (2020). A Study on the Effectiveness of a Teaching Based on Socio-Scientific Issues in the Training of Pre-Service Teachers. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 15(2), 220-231. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v15i2.4604

Cebesoy, Ü. B. (2021). Pre-Service Science Teachers Informal Reasoning Patterns and Risk Perceptions in SSI: Case of Gene Therapy. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(4), 211-229. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/11237

Cebesoy, U. B., & Rundgren, S. C. (2021). Embracing Socioscientific Issues-Based Teaching and Decision-Making in Teacher Professional Development. Educational Review, 75(3), 507-534. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1931037

Chang, H., Liang, J., & Tsai, C. (2020). Students’ Context-Specific Epistemic Justifications, Prior Knowledge, Engagement, and Socioscientific Reasoning in a Mobile Augmented Reality Learning Environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 399-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09825-9

Chang, H., Wu, H., & Hsu, Y. (2013). Integrating a Mobile Augmented Reality Activity to Contextualize Student Learning of a Socioscientic Issue. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 95-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01379.x

Chang, H. Y., Hsu, Y. S., & Wu, H. K. (2014). A Comparison Study of Augmented Reality Versus Interactive Simulation Technology to Support Student Learning of a Socio-Scientific Issue. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1148-1161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.961486

Chen, Y., & So, W. (2017). An Investigation of Mainland China High School Biology Teachers’ Attitudes Toward and Ethical Reasoning of Three Controversial Bioethics Issues. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 3(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-016-0012-6

Christenson, N., & Walan, S. (2023). Developing Pre-Service Teachers’ Competence in Assessing Socioscientific Argumentation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 34(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.2018103

Daniel, E. (2016). The Usefulness of Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Researching Problem-Solving Ability in Science Education Curriculum. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(15), 91-100.

Dauer, J. M., Lute, M. L., & Straka, O. (2016). Indicators of Informal and Formal Decision-Making about a Socioscientific Issue. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(1), 124-124. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.05787

Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-Methods Research: A Discussion on its Types, Challenges, and Criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20

Dawson, V. (2015). Western Australian High School Students’ Understandings About the Socioscientific Issue of Climate Change. International Journal of Science Education, 37(7), 1024-1043. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1015181

Eberle, J., Stegmann, K., Barrat, A., Fischer, F., & Lund, K. (2021). Initiating Scientific Collaborations Across Career Levels and Disciplines – A Network Analysis on Behavioral Data. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 16(2), 151-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-021-09345-7

Eggert, S., Nitsch, A., Boone, W., Nückles, M., & Bögeholz, S. (2017). Supporting Students’ Learning and Socioscientific Reasoning about Climate Change - The Effect of Computer-Based Concept Mapping Scaffolds. Research in Science Education, 47(1), 137-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9493-7

Eggert, S., Ostermeyer, F., Hasselhorn, M., & Bögeholz, S. (2013). Socioscientific Decision Making in the Science Classroom: The Effect of Embedded Metacognitive Instructions on Students’ Learning Outcomes. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Education Research International, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/309894

Eryasar, A. S., & Kilinc, A. (2022). The Coherence Between Epistemologies and SSI Teaching: A Multiple-Case Study with Three Science Teachers. Science & Education, 31(1), 123-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00200-7

Eş, H., & Öztürk, N. (2021). An Activity for Transferring the Multidimensional Structure of SSI to Middle School Science Courses: I Discover Myself in the Decision-Making Process with SEE-STEP! Research in Science Education, 51(3), 889-910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09865-1

Estevez, A. V., García-Sánchez, P., Moral-Munoz, J. A., & Cobo, M. J. (2022). Why do Papers from International Collaborations Get More Citations? A Bibliometric Analysis of Library and Information Science Papers. Scientometrics, 127(12), 7517-7555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04486-4

Estigarribia, L., Chalabe, J. T., Cisnero, K., & Romano, L. G. (2022). Co-Design of a Teaching-Learning Sequence to Address Covid‑19 as a Socio‑Scientific Issue in an Infodemic Context. Science & Education, 31(6), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00362-y

Evagorou, M., & Osborne, J. (2013). Exploring Young Students’ Collaborative Argumentation Within a Socioscientific Issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21076

Fang, S. C., Hsu, Y. S., & Lin, S. S. (2019). Conceptualizing Socioscientific Decision Making from a Review of Research in Science Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(3), 427-448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9890-2

Genel, A., & Topçu, M. (2016). Turkish Preservice Science Teachers’ Socioscientific Issues-Based Teaching Practices in Middle School Science Classrooms. Research in Science & Technological Education, 34(1), 105-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2015.1124847

Grace, M., Lee, Y., Asshoff, R., & Wallin, A. (2015). Student Decision-Making About a Globally Familiar Socioscientific Issue: The Value of Sharing and Comparing Views with International Counterparts. International Journal of Science Education, 37(11), 1855-1874. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1054000

Gresch, H., Hasselhorn, M., & Bögeholz, S. (2013). Training in Decision-Making Strategies: An Approach to Enhance Students’ Competence to Deal with Socio-Scientific Issues. International Journal of Science Education, 35(15), 2587-2607. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.617789

______. (2015). Enhancing Decision-Making in STSE Education by Inducing Reflection and Self-Regulated Learning. International Journal of Science Education, 47(1), 95-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9491-9

Grooms, J. (2020). A Comparison of Argument Quality and Students’ Conceptions of Data and Evidence for Undergraduates Experiencing Two Types of Laboratory Instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(8), 2057-2064. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00026

Grooms, J., Sampson, V., & Golden, B. (2014). Comparing the Effectiveness of Verification and Inquiry Laboratories in Supporting Undergraduate Science Students in Constructing Arguments Around Socioscientific Issues. International Journal of Science Education, 36(9), 1412-1433. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.891160.

Gül, M., & Akcay, H. (2020). Structuring a New Socioscientific Issues (SSI) Based Instruction Model: Impacts on Pre-Service Science Teachers’(PSTS) Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(1), 141-159. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i1.785

Guler, M. P. D. (2013). Investigation on the Inclusion of Socio-Scientific Acquisitions in Curriculum of Science and Technology Lesson. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(24), 2295-2302. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2013.1607

Ha, H., Park, W., & Song, J. (2022). Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Socioscientific Reasoning During a Decision-Making Activity in the Context of Covid-19. Science & Education, 32(1), 1869-1886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00359-7

Halim, M., & Saat, R. (2017). Exploring Students’ Understanding in Making a Decision on a Socioscientific Issue Using a Persuasive Graphic Organiser. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(5), 813-824. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.813

Herman, B. C. (2015). The Influence of Global Warming Science Views and Sociocultural Factors on Willingness to Mitigate Global Warming. Science Education, 99(1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21136

Herman, B. C., Owens, D. C., Oertli, R. T., Zangori, L. A., & Newton, M. H. (2019). Exploring the Complexity of Students’ Scientific Explanations and Associated Nature of Science Views Within a Place-Based Socioscientific Issue Context. Science & Education, 28(1), 329-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00034-4

Herman, B., Zeidler, D., & Newton, M. (2020). Students’ Emotive Reasoning Through Place-Based Environmental Socioscientific Issues. Research in Science Education, 50(1), 2081-2109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9764-1

Horin, H. B., Kali, Y., & Tal, T. (2023). The Fifth Dimension in Socio-Scientific Reasoning: Promoting Decision-Making about Socio-Scientific Issues in a Community. Sustainability, 15(12), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129708

Hsu, C., Tsai, M., Hou, H., & Tsai, C. (2014). Epistemic Beliefs, Online Search Strategies, and Behavioral Patterns While Exploring Socioscientific Issues. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 471-480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9477-1

Hsu, Y., & Lin, S. (2017). Prompting Students to Make Socioscientific Decisions: Embedding Metacognitive Guidance in an E-Learning Environment. International Journal of Science Education, 39(7), 964-979. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1312036

Jafari, M., & Meisert, A. (2021). Activating Students’ Argumentative Resources on Socioscientific Issues by Indirectly Instructed Reasoning and Negotiation Processes. Research in Science Education, 51(2), 913-934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09869-x

Jho, H., Yoon, H. G., & Kim, M. J. (2013). The Relationship of Science Knowledge, Attitude and Decision Making on Socio-Scientific Issues: The Case Study of Students’ Debates on a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea. Science & Education, 23(5), 1131-1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9652-z

Jumadi, Perdana, R., Riwayani, & Rosana, D. (2021). The Impact of Problem-Based Learning with Argument Mapping and Online Laboratory on Scientific Argumentation Skill. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 16-23. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20593

Juntunen, M. K., & Aksela, M. K. (2014). Improving Students’ Argumentation Skills Through a Product Life-Cycle Analysis Project in Chemistry Education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 639-649. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00068D

Karahan, E., Andzenge, S., & Roehrig, G. (2017). Eliciting Students’ Understanding of a Local Socioscientific Issue Through the Use of Critical Response Pedagogies. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(2), 88-100. http://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.41401

Karahan, E., & Roehrig, G. (2017). Case study of science and social studies teachers co-teaching socioscientific issues-based instruction. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 72(1), 63-82. https://doi.org/10.16986/huje.2018044772

Karpudewan, M., & Roth, W. (2016). Changes in Primary Students’ Informal Reasoning During an Environment-Related Curriculum on Socio-Scientific Issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(3), 401-419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9787-x

Khishfe, R. (2014). Explicit Nature of Science and Argumentation Instruction in the Context of Socioscientific Issues: an Effect on Student Learning and Transfer. International Journal of Science Education, 36(6), 974-1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.832004

Khishfe, R., Alshaya, F., BouJaoude, S., & Alrudiyan, K. (2017). Students’ Understandings of Nature of Science and Their Arguments in the Context of Four Socio-Scientific Issues. International Journal of Science Education, 39(3), 299-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1280741

Kinslow, A. T., Sadler, T. D., & Nguyen, H. T. (2019). Socio-Scientific Reasoning and Environmental Literacy in a Field-Based Ecology Class. Environmental Education Research, 25(3), 388-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1442418

Kolarova, T., Hadjiali, I., & Denev, I. (2013). High School Students’ Reasoning in Making Decisions about Socio-Ethical Issues of Genetic Engineering: Case of Gene Therapy. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 27(2), 3737-3747. https://doi.org/10.5504/BBEQ.2012.0133

Kutluca, A. Y. (2021). An Investigation of Elementary Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Socioscientific Argumentation: The Effect of a Learning and Teaching Experience. Science Education, 105(4), 743-775. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21624

Kutluca, A. Y., & Aydin, A. (2016). An Examination of Prospective Elementary Science Teachers’ Perspective Towards Socio-Scientific Argumentation. Science Education International, 27(3), 320-343.

______. (2018). Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Nature of Science Understandings’ Influence on Their Socioscientific Argumentation Quality. Elementary Education Online, 17(2), 642-657. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2018.419009

Ladachart, L., & Ladachart, L. (2021). Preservice Biology Teachers’ Decision-Making and Informal Reasoning about Culture-Based Socioscientific Issues. International Journal of Science Education, 43(5), 641-671. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1876958

Lee, H. J., Yoo, J., Choi, K., Kim, S. W., Krajcik, J., Herman, B. M., & Zeidler, D. L. (2013). Socioscientific Issues as a Vehicle for Promoting Character and Values for Global Citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2079-2113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.749546

Lee, H., Lee, H. J., & Zeidler, D. L. (2020). Examining Tensions in the Socioscientific Issues Classroom: Students’ Border Crossings into a New Culture of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(5), 672-694. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21600

Leung, J. S. C. (2020). Promoting Students’ Use of Epistemic Understanding in the Evaluation of Socioscientific Issues Through a Practice-Based Approach. Instructional Science, 48(1), 591-622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09522-5

Leung, J. S. C., Wong, A. S. L., & Yung, B. H. W. (2015). Understandings of Nature of Science And Multiple Perspective Evaluation of Science News by Non-Science Majors. Science & Education, 24(7), 887-912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-014-9736-4

Leung, J. W. T. (2020). A Practice-Based Approach to Learning Nature of Science Through Socioscientific Issues. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 259-285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09942-w

Lin, J., Cheng, T., Wang, S., & Chung, C. (2020). The Effects of Socioscientific Issues Web Searches on Grade 6 Students’ Scientific Epistemological Beliefs: The Role of Information Positions. International Journal of Science Education, 42(15), 2534-2553. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1821258

Lindahl, M., & Folkesson, A. (2016). Attitudes and Language Use in Group Discussions on Socio-Scientific Issues. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(2), 283-301. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1214a

Lindahl, M. G., & Lundin, M. (2016). How Do 15-16 Year Old Students Use Scientific Knowledge to Justify their Reasoning about Human Sexuality and Relationships? Teaching and Teacher Education, 60(1), 121-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.009

Lorite, I. M. C., Robles, D. C., Expósito, M. d. C. A., & Evagorou, M. (2023). Analysis of the Informal Reasoning Modes of Preservice Primary Teachers When Arguing About a Socio-Scientific Issue on Nuclear Power During a Role Play. Sustainability, 15(5), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054291

Lubis, S. P. W., Suryadarma, I. G. P., Paidi, & Yanto, B. E. (2022). The Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning with Local Wisdom Oriented to Socio-Scientific Issues. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 455-472. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15225a

Muis, K., Chevrier, M., Denton, C., & Losenno, K. (2021). Epistemic Emotions and Epistemic Cognition Predict Critical Thinking about Socio-Scientific Issues. Frontiers in Education, 6(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.669908

Nida, S., Pratiwi, N., & Eilks, I. (2021). A Case study on the Use of Contexts and Socio-Scientific Issues-Based Science Education by Pre-Service Junior High School Science Teachers in Indonesia During their Final Year Teaching Internship. Frontiers in Education, 5(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.592870

Owens, D., Herman, B., Oertli, R., Lannin, A., & Sadler, T. (2019). Secondary Science and Mathematics Teachers’ Environmental Issues Engagement Through Socioscientific Reasoning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(6), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103561

Owens, D., Petitt, D., Lally, D., & Forbes, C. (2020). Cultivating Water Literacy in Stem Education: Undergraduates’ Socio-Scientific Reasoning about Socio-Hydrologic Issues. Water, 12(10), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102857

Owens, D., Sadler, T., Petitt, D., & Forbes, C. (2022). Exploring Undergraduates’ Breadth of Socio-Scientific Reasoning Through Domains of Knowledge. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 1643-1658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10014-w

Özcan, E., & Balim, A. G. (2021). The Effect of Socio-Scientific Argumentation Method on Students’ Entrepreneurship Perceptions. Participatory Educational Research, 8(1), 309-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.21.18.8.1

Özden, M. (2015). Prospective Elementary School Teachers’ Views about Socioscientific Issues: A Concurrent Parallel Design Study. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 7(3), 333-354.

Öztürk, A. (2017). An Investigation of Prospective Science Teachers’ Socio-Scientific Argumentation Processes in Terms of Metacognition: A Causal-Comparative Study. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 7(4), 547-582. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2017.020

Öztürk, N., & Tuzun, O. Y. (2016). Preservice Science Teachers’ Epistemological Beliefs and Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues. Research in Science Education, 47(6), 1275-1304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9548-4

Pitiporntapin, S., Yutakom, N., Sadler, T. D., & Hines, L. M. (2018). Enhancing Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Understanding and Practices of Socioscientific Issues (SSIs)-Based Teaching Via An Online Mentoring Program. Asian Social Science, 14(5), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v14n5p1

Pratiwi, Y., Rahayu, S., & Fajaroh, F. (2016). Socioscientific Issues (SSI) in Reaction Rates Topic and its Effect on the Critical Thinking Skills of High School Students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i2.7676

Rahman, M. S. (2016). The Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Language “Testing and Assessment” Research: A Literature Review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 102-113. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p102

Rashid, H., & Sipahi, E. (2021). The Importance of Quantitative Research in Language Testing and Assessment: In the Context of Social Works. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(1), 317-330. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS1.1413

Robertshaw, B., & Campbell, T. (2013). Constructing Arguments: Investigating Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Argumentation Skills in a Socio-Scientific Context. Science Education International, 24(2), 195-211.

Rodrigues, R. S., Neubert, P. D. S., & De Araújo, B. K. H. (2020). The Publications of Brazilian Authors: Access, Distribution and Ppublishers. Em Questão, 26(2), 13-31. https://doi.org/10.19132/1808-5245262.13-31

Romine, W., Sadler, T., & Kinslow, A. (2017). Assessment of Scientific Literacy: Development and Validation of the Quantitative Assessment of Socio‐Scientific Reasoning (QuASSR). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 274-295. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21368

Rundgren, C. J., Eriksson, M., & Rundgren, S. N. C. (2016). Investigating the Intertwinement of Knowledge, Value, and Experience of Upper Secondary Students’ Argumentation Concerning Socioscientific Issues. Science & Education, 25(9), 1049-1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9859-x

Sadler, T., Romine, W., & Topçu, M. (2016). Learning Science Content Through Socio-Scientific Issues-Based Instruction: A Multi-Level Assessment Study. International Journal of Science Education, 38(10), 1622-1635. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1204481

Sağlam, H., & Eroglu, B. (2022). A Mixed-Method Study on Pre-Service Teachers’ Informal Reasoning Regarding Nuclear Energy Use. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(2), 594-607. http://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2022.139

Sakamoto, M., Yamaguchi, E., Yamamoto, T., & Wakabayashi, K. (2021). An Intervention Study on Students’ Decision-Making Towards Consensus Building on Socio-Scientific Issues. International Journal of Science Education, 43(12), 1965-1983. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1947541

Sakschewski, M., Eggert, S., Schneider, S., & Bögeholz, S. (2014). Students’ Socioscientific Reasoning and Decision-making on Energy-related Issues-Development of a Measurement Instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 36(14), 2291-2313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.920550

Saputri, M., Muliadi, A., & Safnowandi. (2022). Profil Minat Belajar Siswa dengan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) pada Kelas XI. Educatoria : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(3), 148-155. https://doi.org/10.36312/ejiip.v2i3.98

Solbes, J., Torres, N., & Traver, M. (2018). Use of Socio-Scientific Issues in Order to Improve Critical Thinking Competences. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 19(1), 1-22.

Solli, A. (2021). Appeals to Science: Recirculation of Online Claims in Socioscientific Reasoning. Research in Science Education, 51(1), 983-1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09878-w

Sousa, D. (2014). Validation in Qualitative Research: General Aspects and Specificities of the Descriptive Phenomenological Method. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(2), 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.853855

Steffen, B., & Hößle, C. (2017). Assessing Students’ Performances in Decision-Making: Coping Strategies of Biology Teachers. Journal of Biological Education, 51(1), 44-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1156012

Tidemand, S., & Nielsen, J. A. (2017). The Role of Socioscientific Issues in Biology Teaching: From the Perspective of Teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(1), 44-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1264644

Topçu, M. S., Foulk, J. A., Sadler, T. D., Pitiporntapin, S., & Atabey, N. (2017). The Classroom Observation Protocol for Socioscientific Issue-Based Instruction: Development and Implementation of a New Research Tool. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(3), 302-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1399353

Torres, N., & Cristancho, J. (2018). Analysis of the Forms of Argumentation of Teachers in Training in the Context of a Socio-Scientific Issue. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(1), 57-79. http://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10221a

Türkӧz, G., & Öztürk, N. (2019). Determining the Argument Quality of Pre-Service Science Teachers Regarding to Socio-Scientific Issues: Youtube as a Source of Argumentation. Science Education International, 30(4), 319-328. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v30.i4.9

Vesterinen, V., Tolppanen, S., & Aksela, M. (2016). Toward Citizenship Science Education: What students do to Make the World a Better Place? International Journal of Science Education, 38(1), 30-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1125035

Wahono, B., Chang, C., & Khuyen, N. (2021). Teaching Socio-Scientific Issues Through Integrated STEM Education: An Effective Practical Averment from Indonesian Science Lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 43(16), 2663-2683. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1983226

Wahono, B., Narulita, E., Chang, C.Y., Darmawan, E., & Irwanto, I. (2021). The Role of Students’ Worldview on Decision-Making: An Indonesian Case Study by a Socio-Scientific Issue-Based Instruction Through Integrated STEM Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(11), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11246

Walton, T. (2016). Using a Mixed Methods Approach to Investigate University Student Success after Support Service Interaction: A Case Study and Analysis. Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Student Services Association, 48(1), 38-49.

Warfa, A.R. M. (2016). Mixed-Methods Design in Biology Education Research: Approach and Uses. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0022

Yahaya, J., Nurulazam, A., & Karpudewan, M. (2016). College students’ attitudes towards sexually themed science content: A socioscientific issues approach to resolution. International Journal of Science Education, 38(7), 1174-1196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1174349

Yapicioglu, A., & Aycan, S. (2018). Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Decisions and Types of Informal Reasoning about the Socioscientific Issue of Nuclear Power Plants. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 13(1), 31-53.

Yapicioğlu, A. E., & Kaptan, F. (2017). A Mixed Method Research Study on the Effectiveness of Socioscientific Issue-Based Instruction. Education and Science, 42(1), 113-137. http://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.6600

Yeo, M., & Lewis, M. (2019). Co-Authoring in Action: Practice, Problems and Possibilities. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 7(3), 109-123.

Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., Ruzek, M., Linder, A., & Lin, S.S. (2013). Cross-Cultural Epistemological Orientations to Socioscientific Issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21077

Zo`bi, A. (2014). The Effect of Using Socio-Scientific Issues Approach in Teaching Environmental Issues on Improving the Students’ Ability of Making Appropriate Decisions Towards These Issues. International Education Studies, 7(8), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n8p113




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/bioscientist.v11i2.8722

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
Bioscientist : Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Editorial Address: Pemuda Street No. 59A, Catur Building Floor I, Mataram City, West Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia