Analisis Representasi Visual Buku Teks Genetika Tentang DNA

Authors

  • Bekti Isnaeni Yogyakarta State University
  • Paramita Cahyaningrum Kuswandi Yogyakarta State University
  • Agung Wijaya Subiantoro Yogyakarta State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33394/bioscientist.v13i3.16398

Keywords:

Representasi visual; genetika; DNA

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the visual representation aspects and level of representation in genetics textbooks related to DNA material. This study is descriptive qualitative with two genetics textbooks as the research objects. The analysis technique used is visual representation function analysis and level of representation. The results of the analysis show that visual representation is dominated by illustrative functions (70-75%), followed by complementary functions (23-25%), while explanatory functions only appear 5%, and decorative functions are not found. The level of DNA topic representation falls under the molecular level of representation. This finding indicates that the visual representations in both genetics textbooks are predominantly illustrative, followed by complementary functions, while explanatory functions appear only to a limited extent, and decorative functions are absent. This analysis provides valuable insight into the quality of the textbooks and their relevance to potential student misconceptions. The implication of this study is that it can serve as a reference for authors of genetics textbooks, particularly in the topic of DNA, to pay closer attention to the balance of visual representation functions, ensuring that no single function dominates and that the visuals more effectively support students’ conceptual understanding.

References

Akcay, H., Kapici, H. O., & Akcay, B. (2020). Analysis of the representations in turkish middle school science textbooks from 2002 to 2017. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 7(3), 192–216. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.20.42.7.3

Alam, M. F., Uzair, M., & Arshad, U. (2022). Unfolding graphic representation in Science textbooks at intermediate level: A narratological appraisal. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 6(2), 918–928. https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2022(6-ii)76

Anantyarta, P., & Sari, R. L. I. (2017). Analisis respon mahasiswa terhadap media autoplay dengan metode mea sebagai media pembelajaran matakuliah Genetika di IKIP Budi Utomo Malang. Edubiotik: Jurnal Pendidikan, Biologi Dan Terapan, 2(2), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.33503/ebio.v2i02.126

Asikin, Z. (2024). Efektivitas media visual dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep Biologi di sekolah menengah atas. Jurnal Ilmiah IPA Dan Matematika (JIIM), 2(1), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.61116/jiim.v2i1.467

Chen, X., de Goes, L. F., Treagust, D. F., & Eilks, I. (2019). An analysis of the visual representation of redox reactions in secondary chemistry textbooks from different Chinese communities. Education Sciences, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9010042

Cheung, K. K. C., & Winterbottom, M. (2021). Students’ integration of textbook representations into their understanding of photomicrographs: epistemic network analysis. Research in Science and Technological Education, 41(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1920382

Daulay, N., Gultom, T., & Restuati, M. (2020). Analisis kebutuhan pengembangan buku ajar Genetika Mendel pada matakuliah Genetika di Universitas Negeri Medan. Jurnal Biolokus, 3(2), 342–347. https://doi.org/10.30821/biolokus.v3i2.799

Elfada, V. S., Chandra, E., & Mulyani, A. (2015). Analisis kualitas representasi visual buku biologi SMA kelas XI kurikulum 2013 pada materi sel. Scientiae Educatia, 5(2), 1–14.

Evagorou, M., Erduran, S., & Mäntylä, T. (2015). The role of visual representations in scientific practices: from conceptual understanding and knowledge generation to ‘seeing’ how science works. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0024-x

Fernandes Goes, L., Chen, X., Nogueira, K. S. C., Fernandez, C., & Eilks, I. (2020). An analysis of the visual representation of redox reactions. Science Education International, 31(1), 313–324.

Firmansyah, F., Dwi, I., Astriani, D., Kartika, S. D., Saraswati, A., & Rahayu, M. (2025). Augmented reality untuk visualisasi DNA-RNA: Inovasi pembelajaran genetika pada mahasiswa D3 Farmasi. Jurnal Esabi (Jurnal Edukasi Dan Sains Biologi), 7(1), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.37301/esabi.v7i1.117

Gilbert, J. K. (2010). The role of visual representations in the learning and teaching of science: An introduction. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 1–19.

Ginting, F. A. B., & Gultom, T. (2021). Pengembangan lembar kerja mahasiswa materi biologi molekuler pada mahasiswa Biologi Universitas Negeri Medan. Prosiding Sixth Postgraduate Bio Expo 2021, 341–349.

Hariyadi, S. (2018). Identifikasi dan revisi miskonsepsi materi substansi hereditas pada mahasiswa peserta semester sisipan di Universitas Jember. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 2(2), 33–36. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jppms/article/view/7186

Hertati, S., Aripin, I., & Mu’minah, I. H. (2020). Representasi visual buku Biologi SMA. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, 21, 106–112.

Hertati, S., Aripin, I., & Mu’minah, I. H. (2022). Analisis kualitas representasi visual buku biologi SMA kurikulum 2013 revisi pada materi sistem reproduksi. Mirabilis: Journal of Biology Education, 1(1), 29–47. https://repository.stikesmitrakeluarga.ac.id/repository/6028-18537-1-PB-bitter melon-reza.pdf

Inaltekin, T., & Goksu, V. (2019). A research on visual learning representations of primary and secondary science textbooks in Turkey. International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(6), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2019.215.4

Jaganathan, P., & Premalatha, T. (2022). Content analysis of visual representations in biology textbooks across selected educational boards from Asia. Cogent Education, 9(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2057002

Jayati, R. D., Fitriani, L., & Kirana, S. (2024). Analisis kebutuhan bahan ajar anatomi tumbuhan pada mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi Universitas PGRI Silampari. Jurnal Perspektif Pendidika (JPP), 18(2), 300–311.

Kate Wright, L., Wrightstone, E., Trumpore, L., Steele, J., Abid, D. M., & Newman, D. L. (2022). The DNA landscape: Development and application of a new framework for visual communication about DNA. CBE Life Sciences Education, 21(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-01-0007

Khairani, M., Kinanti, A. A., Syahfitri, D. I., Lubis, F. M., & Sinurat, Y. (2024). Literatur review: Perubahan materi genetik. Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Akademik, 1(3), 872–879. https://doi.org/10.61722/jmia.v1i3.1803

Khairani, M., Simanungkalit, A. ., Azura, D., Handayani, F., & Mawaddah, H. (2024). Efektivitas praktikum kancing Genetika terhadap hasil belajar psikomotorik Mahasiswa/I Pendidikan Biologi UINSU pada materi pewarisan sifat. Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Mahasiswa, 2(4), 141–146. https://ejurnal.kampusakademik.my.id/index.php/jipm/article/view/257/224

Lima, M. S., Sotério, C., Larine, H. M., & Queiroz, S. L. (2022). Analyzing visual representation in Brazilian Chemistry textbooks. Hands-on Science. Rethinking STEAM Education in Times of Uncertainty.

Liu, Y., & Khine, M. S. (2016). Content analysis of the diagrammatic representations of primary science textbooks. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(8), 1937–1951. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1288a

Lubis, N. S., Khairuna, K., & Adlini, M. N. (2024). Analisis buku teks Biologi SMA kelas XI kurikulum 2013 dan kurikulum merdeka berdasarkan literasi ilmiah. SCIENCE: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 4(3), 207–213.

Maduratna, M., & Jayanti, U. N. A. D. (2022). Visual representation of biology books on circulatory system material. Bioeduscience, 6(2), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.22236/j.bes/629415

Mahrus, M., Zulkifli, L., & AR, S. (2019). Implementasi pembelajaran lesson study pada matakuliah Genetika. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA), 5(2), 154–158. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v5i2.197

Marlina, S., Chandra, E., & Cahyani, D. (2018). Kualitas literasi biologi buku teks Biologi kelas XII semester II pada pokok bahasan bioteknologi. Jurnal Ilmu Alam Indonesia, 1(1), 1–13. www.syekhnurjati.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/jia

Masrur, H., Corebima, A. D., & Ghofur, A. (2017). Pengembangan buku suplemen mutasi gen pada matakuliah genetika. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 2(9), 1160–1167. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/

Maysyaroh, U., & Noor, M. F. (2025). Identification of students’ misconceptions in genetic materials using four-tier diagnostic test. Inornatus: Biology Education Journal, 5(2), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.30862/inornatus.v5i2.844

Mifianita, A., Suyanto, S., & Aminatun, T. (2022). Analysis of the quality of visual representation of electronic school book (ESB) on biology subjects at senior high school. AIP Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0113685

Mulyani, A. (2014). Representasi visual buku biologi SMA pada materi kingdom plantae. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 3(1), 35–47.

Mulyani, A. (2017). Penguasaan mahasiswa calon guru Biologi terhadap representasi visual dalam botani phanerogamae. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 6(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v6i1.1376

Munfaridah, N., Avraamidou, L., & Goedhart, M. (2021). The use of multiple representations in undergraduate physics education: What do we know and where do we go from here? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9577

Muthmainnah, N. G., & Ruslan, A. (2025). Analisis kualitatif terhadap visualisasi peristiwa dalam buku teks Sejarah kelas X di SMA Islam PB Soedirman Cijantung. Nuansa: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial Dan Keagamaan Islam, 22(2), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.19105/nuansa.v18i1.xxxx

Nurlaila, L., Sriyati, S., & Riandi, R. (2017). Analizing student Biology Education misconception and scientific argumentation ability using diagnostic question clusters (Dqcs) of molecular genetic concept. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 755(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001

Papageorgiou, G., Amariotakis, V., & Spiliotopoulou, V. (2017). Visual representations of microcosm in textbooks of chemistry: Constructing a systemic network for their main conceptual framework. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 559–571. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp00253f

Papageorgiou, G., Amariotakis, V., & Spiliotopoulou, V. (2019). Developing a axonomy for visual representation characteristics of submicroscopic particles in Chemistry textbooks. Science Education International, 30(3), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v30.i3.4

Papatheodosiou, K., Salta, K., & Koulougliotis, D. (2020). Classification systems of visual representations included in biology textbooks. International Conference The Future of Education, 416–420.

Park, J., Lee, Y. J., Koh, A., & Tan, G. (2025). The complementary roles of visual and written representations within figures in Science textbooks. Research in Science Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10246-0

Parthasarathy, J., & Premalatha, T. (2020). Coding visuals in Biology textbooks. The International Journal of Analytical and Experimental Modal Analysis, XII(X), 790–794. http://www.ijaema.com/gallery/90-ijaema-october-4737.pdf

Patrick, M. D., Carter, G., & Wiebe, E. N. (2005). Visual representations of DNA replication: Middle grades students’ perceptions and interpretations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(3), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-7200-6

Postigo, Y., & López-Manjón, A. (2018). Images in biology: are instructional criteria used in textbook image design? International Journal of Science Education, 41(2), 210–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1548043

Prasetiyo, N. A., & Perwiraningtyas, P. (2017). Pengembangan buku ajar berbasis lingkungan hidup pada Matakuliah Biologi di Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 3(1), 19–27. http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/jpbi

Prastyaningtias, S. D. (2022). Efektivitas pembelajaran mata kuliah Genetika pada mahasiswa Institut Teknologi dan Sains Nahdlatul Ulama Pasuruan melalui media whatsapp dan google classroom. Jurnal Biologi Edukasi (JBioEd), 14(2), 49–55.

Rengkuan, M. (2020). Pengembangan media pembelajaran Genetika berbasis multimedia di Universitas Negeri Manado (Unima). Jurnal Sains Pendidikan Biologi (JSPB BIOEDUSAINS), 1(2), 30–37.

Ritonga, R. F., Maesaroh, M., & Kartikawati, E. (2022). Analisis kesesuaian materi sistem pernapasan dan sistem percernaan pada buku teks Biologi SMA. Biodik: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 8(2), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v8i2.15634

Roth, W.-M., & Pozzer-Ardenghi, L. (2013). Pictures in biology education. In Multiple representations in biological education (pp. 39–53). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4192-8_3

Setiawati, G. A. D. (2019). Lesson study dalam mata kuliah Genetika melalui model problem based learning pada program studi pendidikan biologi UNMAS Denpasar. Indonesian Journal of Educational Science (IJES), 1(2), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.31605/ijes.v1i2.257

Sukmawati, I., & Permadani, K. G. (2022). Analisis kebutuhan pengembangan buku perkuliahan Genetika berbasis kajian miskonsepsi pada Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 12(2), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v12i2.189

Sumampouw, H. M., & Rengkuan, M. (2018). Penggunaan web offline sebagai media pembelajaran Genetika di perguruan tinggi (PT). Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi Kepulauan, 1, 15–25.

Trahorsch, P., & Bláha, J. D. (2020). Visual representation of the curriculum in geography textbooks: quantification of visuals in educational medium analysis. IARTEM E-Journal: Nternational Association for Research on Textbooks and Educational Media, 11(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.21344/iartem.v11i2.587

Utami, R. K., & Subiantoro, A. W. (2021). Visual representations analysis of senior high school biology textbooks about plants’ structure and function. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Sciences (ICRIEMS 2020), 528, 123–128. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210305.019

Waoma, W. M. (2023). Analisis miskonsepsi materi pada buku pembelajaran biologi kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Luahagundre Maniamolo tahun pembelajaran 2022/2023. FAGURU: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Keguruan, 2(2), 59–73.

Wati, R., Chandra, E., & Mulyani, A. (2021). Analysis of pedagogical content of Biology text books on structures and functions of animal tissues for class XI. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 10(2), 184–193. https://doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v10i2.9163

Wei, B., Wang, C., & Tan, L. (2022). Visual representation of optical content in China’s and Singapore’s junior secondary physics textbooks. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.020138

Wulandari, S., Gusmalini, A., & Zulfarina, Z. (2021). Analisis miskonsepsi mahasiswa pada konsep Genetika menggunakan instrumen four tier diagnostic test. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (JPSI), 9(4), 642–654. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v9i4.21153

Downloads

Published

2025-09-27

How to Cite

Isnaeni, B., Kuswandi, P. C., & Subiantoro, A. W. (2025). Analisis Representasi Visual Buku Teks Genetika Tentang DNA. Bioscientist : Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 13(3), 2349–2359. https://doi.org/10.33394/bioscientist.v13i3.16398

Issue

Section

Articles